The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an electronic apex locator, the Endocater, in determining the location of the apical constriction or cementodentinal junction (CDJ). Measurements made by the Endocater were also compared with the adjustments recommended by an experienced endodontist. A total of 69 teeth with 99 canals from nine patients were evaluated. The results indicated that the evaluator was 95.8% and the Endocater 67.7% accurate in positioning the probe within +/- 1.000 mm from the CDJ. Thirty-three canals or 34.4% appeared to be clinically acceptable radiographically and no adjustments were deemed necessary by the evaluator. There was a significant difference (p less than 0.003) between the evaluator's ability to adjust the electronically generated file length radiograph to acceptable clinical standards and the Endocater's ability to determine the location of the CDJ. A total of 59 canals (59.6%) of the electronically determined working lengths were beyond the CDJ (n = 99). In 27 canals, the tip of the probe was greater than 1 mm beyond the constriction. Without radiographs to confirm working lengths, many canals in this study would have been overinstrumented. Future research with electronic apex locators is needed before accepting the technique as a substitution for radiographic working length determination.