Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review. 2009

Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
Department of Medical Biometry and Statistics (German Cochrane Center), Institute of Medical Biometry and Medical Informatics, University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany. schmucker@cochrane.de

BACKGROUND Amblyopia and amblyogenic factors like strabismus and refractive errors are the most common vision disorders in children. Although different studies suggest that preschool vision screening is associated with a reduced prevalence rate of amblyopia, the value of these programmes is the subject of a continuing scientific and health policy discussion. Therefore, this systematic review focuses on the question of whether screening for amblyopia in children up to the age of six years leads to better vision outcomes. METHODS Ten bibliographic databases were searched for randomised controlled trials, non-randomised controlled trials and cohort studies with no limitations to a specific year of publication and language. The searches were supplemented by handsearching the bibliographies of included studies and reviews to identify articles not captured through our main search strategy. RESULTS Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, three studies suggested that screening is associated with an absolute reduction in the prevalence of amblyopia between 0.9% and 1.6% (relative reduction: between 45% and 62%). However, the studies showed weaknesses, limiting the validity and reliability of their findings. The main limitation was that studies with significant results considered only a proportion of the originally recruited children in their analysis. On the other hand, retrospective sample size calculation indicated that the power based on the cohort size was not sufficient to detect small changes between the groups. Outcome parameters such as quality of life or adverse effects of screening have not been adequately investigated in the literature currently available. CONCLUSIONS Population based preschool vision screening programmes cannot be sufficiently assessed by the literature currently available. However, it is most likely that the present systematic review contains the most detailed description of the main limitations in current available literature evaluating these programmes. Therefore, future research work should be guided by the findings of this publication.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000550 Amblyopia A nonspecific term referring to impaired vision. Major subcategories include stimulus deprivation-induced amblyopia and toxic amblyopia. Stimulus deprivation-induced amblyopia is a developmental disorder of the visual cortex. A discrepancy between visual information received by the visual cortex from each eye results in abnormal cortical development. STRABISMUS and REFRACTIVE ERRORS may cause this condition. Toxic amblyopia is a disorder of the OPTIC NERVE which is associated with ALCOHOLISM, tobacco SMOKING, and other toxins and as an adverse effect of the use of some medications. Anisometropic Amblyopia,Lazy Eye,Amblyopia, Developmental,Amblyopia, Stimulus Deprivation-Induced,Amblyopia, Suppression,Stimulus Deprivation-Induced Amblyopia,Amblyopia, Anisometropic,Amblyopia, Stimulus Deprivation Induced,Amblyopias,Amblyopias, Anisometropic,Amblyopias, Developmental,Amblyopias, Stimulus Deprivation-Induced,Amblyopias, Suppression,Anisometropic Amblyopias,Deprivation-Induced Amblyopia, Stimulus,Deprivation-Induced Amblyopias, Stimulus,Developmental Amblyopia,Developmental Amblyopias,Eye, Lazy,Eyes, Lazy,Lazy Eyes,Stimulus Deprivation Induced Amblyopia,Stimulus Deprivation-Induced Amblyopias,Suppression Amblyopia,Suppression Amblyopias
D015351 Vision Screening Application of tests and examinations to identify visual defects or vision disorders occurring in specific populations, as in school children, the elderly, etc. It is differentiated from VISION TESTS, which are given to evaluate/measure individual visual performance not related to a specific population. Screening, Vision,Screenings, Vision,Vision Screenings
D015397 Program Evaluation Studies designed to assess the efficacy of programs. They may include the evaluation of cost-effectiveness, the extent to which objectives are met, or impact. Evaluation, Program,Family Planning Program Evaluation,Program Appropriateness,Program Effectiveness,Program Sustainability,Appropriateness, Program,Effectiveness, Program,Evaluations, Program,Program Evaluations,Program Sustainabilities,Sustainabilities, Program,Sustainability, Program
D016021 Epidemiologic Studies Studies designed to examine associations, commonly, hypothesized causal relations. They are usually concerned with identifying or measuring the effects of risk factors or exposures. The common types of analytic study are CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COHORT STUDIES; and CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES. Epidemiological Studies,Studies, Epidemiologic,Epidemiologic Study,Epidemiological Study,Studies, Epidemiological,Study, Epidemiologic,Study, Epidemiological
D017063 Outcome Assessment, Health Care Research aimed at assessing the quality and effectiveness of health care as measured by the attainment of a specified end result or outcome. Measures include parameters such as improved health, lowered morbidity or mortality, and improvement of abnormal states (such as elevated blood pressure). Assessment, Outcome,Outcome Assessment,Outcome Assessment (Health Care),Outcomes Research,Assessment, Outcomes,Outcome Measures,Outcome Studies,Outcomes Assessment,Assessment, Outcome (Health Care),Assessments, Outcome,Assessments, Outcome (Health Care),Assessments, Outcomes,Measure, Outcome,Measures, Outcome,Outcome Assessments,Outcome Assessments (Health Care),Outcome Measure,Outcome Study,Outcomes Assessments,Research, Outcomes,Studies, Outcome,Study, Outcome

Related Publications

Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
June 2011, Ophthalmology,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
May 1984, [Zhonghua yan ke za zhi] Chinese journal of ophthalmology,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
March 1998, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
May 1968, JAMA,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
August 2021, BMJ open,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
January 2003, Binocular vision & strabismus quarterly,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
February 2005, Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
June 1999, The British journal of ophthalmology,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
March 2024, Preventive medicine reports,
Christine Schmucker, and Robert Grosselfinger, and Rob Riemsma, and Gerd Antes, and Stefan Lange, and Wolf Lagrèze, and Jos Kleijnen
January 1999, Survey of ophthalmology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!