-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOC), chemicals emitted from various microorganisms, in indoor air have been of concern in recent years. For large field studies, diffusive samplers are widely used to measure indoor environments. Since the sampling rate of a sampler is a fundamental parameter to calculate concentration, the sampling rates of eight MVOC with diffusive samplers were determined experimentally using a newly developed water-bubbling method: air was supplied to the MVOC-solutions and the vapor collected in an exposure bag, where diffusive and active samplers were placed in parallel for comparison. Correlations between the diffusive and active samplings gave good linear regressions. The sampling rates were 30-35 ml/min and the detection limits were 0.044-0.178 microg/m(3), as determined by GC/MS analysis. Application of the sampling rates in indoor air was validated by parallel sampling of the diffusive and active sampling method. 5% Propan-2-ol/CS(2) was the best solvent to desorb the compounds from absorbents. The procedure was applied to a field study in 41 dwellings. The most frequently detected compounds were hexan-2-one and heptan-2-one, with 97.5% detection rates and geometric mean values of 0.470 and 0.302 microg/m(3), respectively. This study shows that diffusive samplers are applicable to measure indoor MVOC levels. Practical Implications At present, there are still limited reports on indoor Microbial Volatile Organic Compounds (MVOC) levels in general dwellings and occupants' health. Compared with active sampling methods, air sampling using a diffusive sampler is particularly advantageous for use in large field studies due to its smallness, light-size, easy-handling, and cost-effectiveness. In this study, sampling rates of selected MVOC of the diffusive sampler were determined using the water-bubbling method: generating gases by water-bubbling and exposing the diffusive and active samplers at the same time. The obtained sampling rates were validated, and the method was applied to the field study.
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
August 1994,
The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
January 2015,
Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
April 2008,
Indoor air,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
February 2010,
Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995),
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
May 2015,
Environmental science. Processes & impacts,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
June 2015,
Environmental science. Processes & impacts,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
January 2004,
Environmental monitoring and assessment,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
December 1985,
Ugeskrift for laeger,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
May 2009,
Nihon eiseigaku zasshi. Japanese journal of hygiene,
A Araki, and
Y Eitaki, and
T Kawai, and
A Kanazawa, and
M Takeda, and
R Kishi
June 2022,
Environmental science & technology,
