BIOMAT Database Logo BIOMAT Database Logo

Salpingotomy versus Salpingectomy in the Treatment of Tubal Gestation. 1922

B Whitehouse

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

B Whitehouse
Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy.
May 2014, Journal of comparative effectiveness research,
B Whitehouse
Treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy by salpingotomy with or without tubal suturing and salpingectomy.
January 1991, Fertility and sterility,
B Whitehouse
Tubal pregnancy: salpingostomy versus salpingotomy.
March 1983, Fertility and sterility,
B Whitehouse
Salpingotomy or salpingectomy in tubal ectopic pregnancy: what do women prefer?
November 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online,
B Whitehouse
Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.
April 2014, Lancet (London, England),
B Whitehouse
Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).
September 2015, Human reproduction (Oxford, England),
B Whitehouse
[Treatment for tubal infertility with linear salpingotomy].
January 1956, Gynecologie pratique,
B Whitehouse
Comparison of the Fertility Outcome of Salpingotomy and Salpingectomy in Women with Tubal Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
January 2016, PloS one,
B Whitehouse
Fertility outcomes after laparoscopic salpingectomy or salpingotomy for tubal ectopic pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study of 95 patients.
December 2017, International journal of surgery (London, England),
B Whitehouse
[Salpingotomy vs salpingectomy--a comparison of women's fertility after surgical treatment of tubal ectopic pregnancy during a 24-month follow-up study].
December 2013, Ginekologia polska,
Copied contents to your clipboard!