Local immune response against larvae of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus in Bos taurus indicus and Bos taurus taurus cattle. 2010

C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
Cooperative Research Centre for Beef Genetic Technologies, Armidale 2351, Australia. constantin.constantinoiu@jcu.edu.au

Bos taurus indicus cattle are less susceptible to infestation with Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus than Bos taurus taurus cattle but the immunological basis of this difference is not understood. We compared the dynamics of leukocyte infiltrations (T cell subsets, B cells, major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II-expressing cells, granulocytes) in the skin near the mouthparts of larvae of R. microplus in B. t. indicus and B. t. taurus cattle. Previously naïve cattle were infested with 50,000 larvae (B. t. indicus) or 10,000 larvae (B. t. taurus) weekly for 6 weeks. One week after the last infestation all of the animals were infested with 20,000 larvae of R. microplus. Skin punch biopsies were taken from all animals on the day before the primary infestation and from sites of larval attachment on the day after the first, second, fourth and final infestations. Infiltrations with CD3(+), CD4(+), CD8(+) and gammadelta T cells followed the same pattern in both breeds, showing relatively little change during the first four weekly infestations, followed by substantial increases at 7 weeks post-primary infestation. There was a tendency for more of all cell types except granulocytes to be observed in the skin of B. t. indicus cattle but the differences between the two breeds were consistently significant only for gammadelta T cells. Granulocyte infiltrations increased more rapidly from the day after infestation and were higher in B. t. taurus cattle than in B. t. indicus. Granulocytes and MHC class II-expressing cells infiltrated the areas closest to the mouthparts of larvae. A large volume of granulocyte antigens was seen in the gut of attached, feeding larvae.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007150 Immunohistochemistry Histochemical localization of immunoreactive substances using labeled antibodies as reagents. Immunocytochemistry,Immunogold Techniques,Immunogold-Silver Techniques,Immunohistocytochemistry,Immunolabeling Techniques,Immunogold Technics,Immunogold-Silver Technics,Immunolabeling Technics,Immunogold Silver Technics,Immunogold Silver Techniques,Immunogold Technic,Immunogold Technique,Immunogold-Silver Technic,Immunogold-Silver Technique,Immunolabeling Technic,Immunolabeling Technique,Technic, Immunogold,Technic, Immunogold-Silver,Technic, Immunolabeling,Technics, Immunogold,Technics, Immunogold-Silver,Technics, Immunolabeling,Technique, Immunogold,Technique, Immunogold-Silver,Technique, Immunolabeling,Techniques, Immunogold,Techniques, Immunogold-Silver,Techniques, Immunolabeling
D007814 Larva Wormlike or grublike stage, following the egg in the life cycle of insects, worms, and other metamorphosing animals. Maggots,Tadpoles,Larvae,Maggot,Tadpole
D007962 Leukocytes White blood cells. These include granular leukocytes (BASOPHILS; EOSINOPHILS; and NEUTROPHILS) as well as non-granular leukocytes (LYMPHOCYTES and MONOCYTES). Blood Cells, White,Blood Corpuscles, White,White Blood Cells,White Blood Corpuscles,Blood Cell, White,Blood Corpuscle, White,Corpuscle, White Blood,Corpuscles, White Blood,Leukocyte,White Blood Cell,White Blood Corpuscle
D008853 Microscopy The use of instrumentation and techniques for visualizing material and details that cannot be seen by the unaided eye. It is usually done by enlarging images, transmitted by light or electron beams, with optical or magnetic lenses that magnify the entire image field. With scanning microscopy, images are generated by collecting output from the specimen in a point-by-point fashion, on a magnified scale, as it is scanned by a narrow beam of light or electrons, a laser, a conductive probe, or a topographical probe. Compound Microscopy,Hand-Held Microscopy,Light Microscopy,Optical Microscopy,Simple Microscopy,Hand Held Microscopy,Microscopy, Compound,Microscopy, Hand-Held,Microscopy, Light,Microscopy, Optical,Microscopy, Simple
D002417 Cattle Domesticated bovine animals of the genus Bos, usually kept on a farm or ranch and used for the production of meat or dairy products or for heavy labor. Beef Cow,Bos grunniens,Bos indicus,Bos indicus Cattle,Bos taurus,Cow,Cow, Domestic,Dairy Cow,Holstein Cow,Indicine Cattle,Taurine Cattle,Taurus Cattle,Yak,Zebu,Beef Cows,Bos indicus Cattles,Cattle, Bos indicus,Cattle, Indicine,Cattle, Taurine,Cattle, Taurus,Cattles, Bos indicus,Cattles, Indicine,Cattles, Taurine,Cattles, Taurus,Cow, Beef,Cow, Dairy,Cow, Holstein,Cows,Dairy Cows,Domestic Cow,Domestic Cows,Indicine Cattles,Taurine Cattles,Taurus Cattles,Yaks,Zebus
D002418 Cattle Diseases Diseases of domestic cattle of the genus Bos. It includes diseases of cows, yaks, and zebus. Bovine Diseases,Bovine Disease,Cattle Disease,Disease, Bovine,Disease, Cattle,Diseases, Bovine,Diseases, Cattle
D005260 Female Females
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D001706 Biopsy Removal and pathologic examination of specimens from the living body. Biopsies
D012867 Skin The outer covering of the body that protects it from the environment. It is composed of the DERMIS and the EPIDERMIS.

Related Publications

C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
July 2009, Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
November 2008, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
July 2010, BMC genomics,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
March 2010, International journal for parasitology,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
January 2012, Journal of parasitology research,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
April 2008, Experimental parasitology,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
January 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
February 2022, Animal genetics,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
May 2004, The Journal of dairy research,
C C Constantinoiu, and L A Jackson, and W K Jorgensen, and A E Lew-Tabor, and E K Piper, and D G Mayer, and B Venus, and N N Jonsson
January 1982, Annales de genetique et de selection animale,
Copied contents to your clipboard!