Sucralfate versus cimetidine in reflux oesophagitis. A double-blind clinical study. 1991

L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
Medical Dept. B, Central Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.

Sixty patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis entered a double-blind clinical study comparing 1 g sucralfate granulate given four times daily and 400 mg cimetidine twice daily. The efficacy, as judged by endoscopy and the symptomatic response, were studied after 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment. Macroscopic healing of oesophagitis was defined as complete epithelialization of all oesophageal erosive lesions classified in accordance with Savary-Miller. Groups were comparable with regard to demographic data. The healing rate at 12 weeks' end point was 62% in the sucralfate group and 59% in the cimetidine group (NS). Half of the patients in both groups (NS) were relieved of symptoms. No adverse effects were recorded. Sucralfate and cimetidine appear to be equally efficient in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D002927 Cimetidine A histamine congener, it competitively inhibits HISTAMINE binding to HISTAMINE H2 RECEPTORS. Cimetidine has a range of pharmacological actions. It inhibits GASTRIC ACID secretion, as well as PEPSIN and GASTRIN output. Altramet,Biomet,Biomet400,Cimetidine HCl,Cimetidine Hydrochloride,Eureceptor,Histodil,N-Cyano-N'-methyl-N''-(2-(((5-methyl-1H-imidazol-4-yl)methyl)thio)ethyl)guanidine,SK&F-92334,SKF-92334,Tagamet,HCl, Cimetidine,Hydrochloride, Cimetidine,SK&F 92334,SK&F92334,SKF 92334,SKF92334
D004311 Double-Blind Method A method of studying a drug or procedure in which both the subjects and investigators are kept unaware of who is actually getting which specific treatment. Double-Masked Study,Double-Blind Study,Double-Masked Method,Double Blind Method,Double Blind Study,Double Masked Method,Double Masked Study,Double-Blind Methods,Double-Blind Studies,Double-Masked Methods,Double-Masked Studies,Method, Double-Blind,Method, Double-Masked,Methods, Double-Blind,Methods, Double-Masked,Studies, Double-Blind,Studies, Double-Masked,Study, Double-Blind,Study, Double-Masked
D004942 Esophagitis, Peptic INFLAMMATION of the ESOPHAGUS that is caused by the reflux of GASTRIC JUICE with contents of the STOMACH and DUODENUM. Esophagitis, Reflux,Esophagitides, Peptic,Esophagitides, Reflux,Peptic Esophagitides,Peptic Esophagitis,Reflux Esophagitides,Reflux Esophagitis
D004945 Esophagoscopy Endoscopic examination, therapy or surgery of the esophagus. Esophagoscopic Surgical Procedures,Surgical Procedures, Esophagoscopic,Esophagoscopic Surgery,Surgery, Esophagoscopic,Esophagoscopic Surgeries,Esophagoscopic Surgical Procedure,Esophagoscopies,Procedure, Esophagoscopic Surgical,Procedures, Esophagoscopic Surgical,Surgeries, Esophagoscopic,Surgical Procedure, Esophagoscopic
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D013392 Sucralfate A basic aluminum complex of sulfated sucrose. Aluminum Sucrose Sulfate,Antepsin,Basic Aluminum Sucrose Sulfate,Carafate,Ulcerban,Ulcogant,Ulsanic,Sulfate, Aluminum Sucrose

Related Publications

L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
August 1987, Journal of clinical gastroenterology,
L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
November 1988, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology,
L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
January 1987, Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement,
L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
January 1984, Digestion,
L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
August 1991, The American journal of medicine,
L Elsborg, and F Jørgensen
June 1989, The American journal of medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!