Comparative efficacy and safety of low-dose pitavastatin versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia. 2010

Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown conflicting results on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction for comparable doses of pitavastatin and atorvastatin. OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy of pitavastatin 1 mg once daily with that of atorvastatin 10 mg once daily on lipoprotein change, safety, and cost per percent LDL-C reduction. METHODS An 8-week, randomized, open-label, parallel trial was conducted in patients with hypercholesterolemia. One hundred patients were equally randomized to receive pitavastatin 1 mg once daily or atorvastatin 10 mg once daily; 98 completed the study. Outcomes were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS Pitavastatin lowered LDL-C levels from baseline by 37% compared with 46% in the atorvastatin group (p < 0.001). The reduction of total cholesterol (TC) levels from baseline was significantly different between the pitavastatin (28%) and atorvastatin (32%) groups (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the percentage of changes in triglyceride and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels between groups. The percentage of patients who achieved LDL-C goals according to National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines was not significantly different between the pitavastatin (74%) and atorvastatin (84%) groups (p = 0.220). In addition, both regimens were well tolerated, with no patient developing an elevation of more than 3 times the upper normal limit of alanine aminotransferase or 10 times that of creatine kinase. The monthly cost per percent LDL-C reduction in the pitavastatin group ($0.77) was about 50% lower than the cost in the atorvastatin ($1.56) group. CONCLUSIONS Although pitavastatin 1 mg daily was not as effective at lowering LDL-C and TC levels as atorvastatin 10 mg daily, the number of patients achieving their LDL-C goals with pitavastatin was comparable with the number using atorvastatin. Pitavastatin 1 mg once daily may be an alternative regimen with cost-saving benefits but without a significant decrease in therapeutic benefit or increase in adverse events in patients with hypercholesterolemia.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008078 Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol which is contained in or bound to low density lipoproteins (LDL), including CHOLESTEROL ESTERS and free cholesterol. LDL Cholesterol,Cholesteryl Linoleate, LDL,LDL Cholesteryl Linoleate,Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol,beta-Lipoprotein Cholesterol,Cholesterol, beta-Lipoprotein,beta Lipoprotein Cholesterol
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D011758 Pyrroles Azoles of one NITROGEN and two double bonds that have aromatic chemical properties. Pyrrole
D011804 Quinolines
D002784 Cholesterol The principal sterol of all higher animals, distributed in body tissues, especially the brain and spinal cord, and in animal fats and oils. Epicholesterol
D003362 Cost-Benefit Analysis A method of comparing the cost of a program with its expected benefits in dollars (or other currency). The benefit-to-cost ratio is a measure of total return expected per unit of money spent. This analysis generally excludes consideration of factors that are not measured ultimately in economic terms. In contrast a cost effectiveness in general compares cost with qualitative outcomes. Cost and Benefit,Cost-Benefit Data,Benefits and Costs,Cost Benefit,Cost Benefit Analysis,Cost-Utility Analysis,Costs and Benefits,Economic Evaluation,Marginal Analysis,Analyses, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Utility,Analysis, Marginal,Benefit and Cost,Cost Benefit Analyses,Cost Benefit Data,Cost Utility Analysis,Cost-Benefit Analyses,Cost-Utility Analyses,Data, Cost-Benefit,Economic Evaluations,Evaluation, Economic,Marginal Analyses
D005260 Female Females
D006538 Heptanoic Acids 7-carbon saturated monocarboxylic acids. Acids, Heptanoic

Related Publications

Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
March 1999, American heart journal,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
April 2012, Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
April 2012, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
August 1998, The American journal of cardiology,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
March 1998, The American journal of cardiology,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
January 2005, The American journal of cardiology,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
May 2011, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
December 2013, The American journal of cardiology,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
April 1997, Atherosclerosis,
Nakarin Sansanayudh, and Supakit Wongwiwatthananukit, and Pawat Putwai, and Rawadee Dhumma-Upakorn
June 2002, Atherosclerosis,
Copied contents to your clipboard!