-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Four endodontic sealers were compared with two series of tests, in thin layer and in 10 mm long and 5 mm diameter rods. Under these conditions, the Pulp Canal Sealer showed the best ability to present a thin layer and the same flow than the Cortisomol. Its setting time was 15 minutes. Forty-eight hours later, the Sealite showed a very good tightness compared to the other sealers. At 30 days, the Pulp Canal Sealer and the OZn-Eugénol were the tightest ones. Less water was absorbed with the Cortisomal and the Sealite. Is there, for these sealers, any correlation between water-absorbtion and tightness?
Related Publications
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
October 2017,
Materials (Basel, Switzerland),
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
January 2010,
Brazilian oral research,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
February 2018,
Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
January 2020,
International journal of dentistry,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
July 1982,
Journal of endodontics,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
January 2010,
Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
October 1975,
Revue d'orthopedie dento-faciale,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
November 1988,
Journal of endodontics,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
January 1988,
The Journal of the Dental Association of Thailand,
P Halimi, and
J Camps, and
M Roche, and
J P Proust
January 1972,
British dental journal,
