-transparent.png){kind=logo}
In this study, clinical performance of Dentinal slot, Amalgapin & Pin Retained Amalgam restoration was evaluated. The study was performed in 20 patients requiring extensive restoration. Clinical evaluation was done by two caliberated experts at 6 months, one year, & one & half year duration. It was concluded that Dentinal slot restorations showed better clinical performance than the Pin retained restorations. However results of Amalgapin restorations were not that promising.
Related Publications
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
April 1979,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
April 1980,
Journal - California Dental Association,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
January 1986,
The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
January 2000,
General dentistry,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
January 1987,
RGO,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
November 1983,
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939),
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
January 1998,
Operative dentistry,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
April 1989,
Dental Cadmos,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
January 1981,
Revista da Associacao Paulista de Cirurgioes Dentistas,
S Tewari, and
C P Govila, and
Y N Paharia
September 1976,
Scandinavian journal of dental research,
