Utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after a concordant benign breast biopsy result. 2011

Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, E3/311 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Ave, Madison, WI 53792-3252, USA.

OBJECTIVE To determine the utility of 6-month follow-up imaging after benign concordant image-guided percutaneous breast biopsy results. METHODS The institutional review board approved this retrospective, HIPAA-compliant study; informed consent was waived. Findings from consecutive stereotactic and ultrasonographically guided core breast biopsies performed from 2001 to 2005 were analyzed and included lesions with benign pathologic findings without atypia found to be concordant with imaging at a consensus conference. Rebiopsy recommendation rates and positive predictive values (PPVs) for detecting malignancy at each follow-up interval were measured and compared by using a two-tailed Fisher exact test. RESULTS In 2244 biopsies, lesions in 1465 were benign, concordant, and not excised. In 1057 of 1465 (72.2%) biopsies with imaging follow-up (average, 26.4 months; range, 4.0-49.9 months), recommended rebiopsy rates were 0.8% (four of 526), 0.5% (three of 588), and 1.0% (eight of 802) at 6-month, 12-month, and long-term follow-up intervals, respectively. When the initial follow-up did not occur until 12 months, the recommended rebiopsy rate was 0.9% (three of 322), compared with 0.8% (four of 526) at 6 months (P > .99), and no malignancies were found in either group. One malignancy was detected at the long-term follow-up interval (PPV for excision recommended, 12% [one of eight]; PPV for excision performed, 20% [one of five]). CONCLUSIONS Because rebiopsy recommendation rates and PPVs did not differ in the 6- and 12-month groups, a 6-month follow-up imaging examination, in the context of a formal concordancy consensus conference, may not contribute to improved breast cancer diagnosis. BACKGROUND http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.10091824/-/DC1.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008327 Mammography Radiographic examination of the breast. 3D-Mammography,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,Digital Mammography,X-ray Breast Tomosynthesis,3D Mammography,3D-Mammographies,Breast Tomosyntheses, Digital,Breast Tomosyntheses, X-ray,Breast Tomosynthesis, Digital,Breast Tomosynthesis, X-ray,Digital Breast Tomosyntheses,Digital Mammographies,Mammographies,Mammographies, Digital,Mammography, Digital,X ray Breast Tomosynthesis,X-ray Breast Tomosyntheses
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D001943 Breast Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the human BREAST. Breast Cancer,Breast Tumors,Cancer of Breast,Breast Carcinoma,Cancer of the Breast,Human Mammary Carcinoma,Malignant Neoplasm of Breast,Malignant Tumor of Breast,Mammary Cancer,Mammary Carcinoma, Human,Mammary Neoplasm, Human,Mammary Neoplasms, Human,Neoplasms, Breast,Tumors, Breast,Breast Carcinomas,Breast Malignant Neoplasm,Breast Malignant Neoplasms,Breast Malignant Tumor,Breast Malignant Tumors,Breast Neoplasm,Breast Tumor,Cancer, Breast,Cancer, Mammary,Cancers, Mammary,Carcinoma, Breast,Carcinoma, Human Mammary,Carcinomas, Breast,Carcinomas, Human Mammary,Human Mammary Carcinomas,Human Mammary Neoplasm,Human Mammary Neoplasms,Mammary Cancers,Mammary Carcinomas, Human,Neoplasm, Breast,Neoplasm, Human Mammary,Neoplasms, Human Mammary,Tumor, Breast
D003365 Costs and Cost Analysis Absolute, comparative, or differential costs pertaining to services, institutions, resources, etc., or the analysis and study of these costs. Affordability,Analysis, Cost,Cost,Cost Analysis,Cost Comparison,Cost Measures,Cost-Minimization Analysis,Costs and Cost Analyses,Costs, Cost Analysis,Pricing,Affordabilities,Analyses, Cost,Analyses, Cost-Minimization,Analysis, Cost-Minimization,Comparison, Cost,Comparisons, Cost,Cost Analyses,Cost Comparisons,Cost Measure,Cost Minimization Analysis,Cost, Cost Analysis,Cost-Minimization Analyses,Costs,Measure, Cost,Measures, Cost
D003937 Diagnosis, Differential Determination of which one of two or more diseases or conditions a patient is suffering from by systematically comparing and contrasting results of diagnostic measures. Diagnoses, Differential,Differential Diagnoses,Differential Diagnosis
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000293 Adolescent A person 13 to 18 years of age. Adolescence,Youth,Adolescents,Adolescents, Female,Adolescents, Male,Teenagers,Teens,Adolescent, Female,Adolescent, Male,Female Adolescent,Female Adolescents,Male Adolescent,Male Adolescents,Teen,Teenager,Youths

Related Publications

Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
December 2018, Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland),
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
January 2016, Clinical imaging,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
October 2013, Annals of surgical oncology,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
April 2012, Breast cancer research and treatment,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
June 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
January 2021, Journal of breast imaging,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
April 2017, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
October 2016, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
September 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
Lonie R Salkowski, and Amy M Fowler, and Elizabeth S Burnside, and Gale A Sisney
June 2014, European radiology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!