Auditory grouping. 1997

C J Darwin

Although our subjective experience of the world is one of discrete sound sources, the individual frequency components that make up these separate sources are spread across the frequency spectrum. Listeners. use various simple cues, including common onset time and harmonicity, to help them achieve this perceptual separation. Our ability to use harmonicity to segregate two simultaneous sound sources is constrained by the frequency resolution of the auditory system, and is much more effective for low-numbered, resolved harmonics than for higher-numbered, unresolved ones. Our ability to use interaural time-differences (ITDs) in perceptual segregation poses a paradox. Although ITDs are the dominant cue for the localization of complex sounds, listeners cannot use ITDs alone to segregate the speech of a single talker from similar simultaneous sounds. Listeners are, however, very good at using ITD to track a particular sound source across time. This difference might reflect two different levels of auditory processing, indicating that listeners attend to grouped auditory objects rather than to those frequencies that share a common ITD.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

C J Darwin
February 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
C J Darwin
May 1996, Network (Bristol, England),
C J Darwin
July 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
C J Darwin
June 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences,
C J Darwin
September 2007, Psychophysiology,
C J Darwin
June 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review,
C J Darwin
January 1993, Biological psychology,
C J Darwin
July 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research,
C J Darwin
December 1977, Child development,
C J Darwin
October 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Copied contents to your clipboard!