The aims of this study were to estimate genetic parameters of image analysis traits of cross-sectioned dry-cured hams and carcass weight (CW) and to investigate effects of some nongenetic sources of variation on these traits. Computer image analysis (CIA) had been carried out for digital images of the cross-section of 1,319 San Daniele dry-cured hams. The cross-sectional area (SA, cm(2)); the average thickness of subcutaneous fat (FT, cm); and the proportions of lean (LA, %), fat-eye (FEA, %), and subcutaneous fat area (SCF, %) to SA, and of biceps femoris (BFA, %) and semitendinosus muscle area (STA, %) to LA were recorded. Bivariate analyses were carried out for pairs of traits for estimation of genetic parameters using Bayesian methodology and linear models. Linear models included the nongenetic effects of slaughter groups and sex and the additive genetic effects of pigs and their ancestors (1,888 animals). Variation of FEA was nearly 4-fold that of SA and LA. Variation of CIA traits due to sex effect was not large, whereas slaughter group effects were relevant sources of variation for all traits. For all traits, with the exception of FEA, the posterior probability for the true heritability being greater than 0.1, was greater than 0.95. Point estimates of heritabilities for FT and SCF were 0.42 and 0.51, respectively. Heritability estimates for FEA, LA, BFA, and STA were 0.13, 0.44, 0.44, and 0.36, respectively. The genetic correlations between CW and CIA traits were positive and large for SA (0.86), positive and moderate for FT, FEA, and STA (0.47, 0.40, and 0.45, respectively) and negative with LA (-0.28). Although FEA, FT, and SCF were all measures of the extent of fat deposition in the ham, the genetic correlations between FT or SCF and FEA were very low. A very large estimate (0.74) was obtained for the genetic relationship between SA and FEA, suggesting that reduction of ham roundness through selective breeding would be beneficial for decreasing FEA. On the basis of the estimated parameters, genetic selection is expected to be effective in changing size of fatty and lean areas of the cross-section of dry-cured hams. Causes related to the abnormal development of the fat-eye depot remain unknown, but this study provided evidence that influences of polygenic effects on phenotypic variation of FEA are limited.