Ex vivo corneal epithelial wound healing following exposure to ophthalmic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. 2011

Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
The Kresge Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA;

OBJECTIVE Ketorolac 0.45% is a new formulation of topical ketorolac in which preservative (benzalkonium chloride, BAK) was removed and carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) was added to improve tolerability and reduce dosing frequency. This study compared the effects of ketorolac 0.45% on corneal wound healing to prior ketorolac formulations (0.4% and 0.5%), bromfenac 0.09%, and nepafenac 0.1%. METHODS Two parallel-group comparisons were performed in series. A 5-mm central epithelial wound was made in fresh porcine corneas. After 24 hours in minimum essential medium (MEM), corneas were incubated for 10 minutes with study drugs, Triton X-100 1% (positive control), or MEM (negative control), followed by 24 hours in MEM. The remaining wound area was stained, photographed, and quantified (pixels). Study 1 compared ketorolac 0.45% to ketorolac 0.4% and ketorolac 0.5%. Study 2 compared ketorolac 0.45% to bromfenac 0.09% and nepafenac 0.1%. RESULTS The mean (±SD) original wound area was 200,506 ± 4,363 pixels, which was reduced to 59,509 ± 4850 at 48 hours after exposure to Triton X-100 1%. In study 1, the mean remaining wound areas at 48 hours in pixels were 2969 ± 1633 with MEM, 586 ± 299 with ketorolac 0.45% (significantly reduced, P < 0.05 vs all other treatments), 10,228 ± 7541 with ketorolac 0.4%, and 50,674 ± 33,409 with ketorolac 0.5% (significantly enlarged, P < 0.05 vs MEM). In study 2, the mean remaining wound areas at 48 hours were 565 ± 1263 with MEM, 322 ± 229 with ketorolac 0.45% (significantly reduced, P < 0.01 vs bromfenac 0.09% and nepafenac 0.1%), 29,093 ± 14,295 with bromfenac 0.09% (significantly enlarged, P <0.01 vs MEM) and 47,322 ± 13,736 with nepafenac 0.1% (significantly enlarged, P < 0.01 vs MEM and vs bromfenac 0.09%). CONCLUSIONS Corneas treated with ketorolac 0.45% healed as rapidly as those treated with MEM, likely secondary to addition of CMC and removal of BAK. In the ex vivo corneal organ culture model, ketorolac 0.45% had statistically less impact on corneal re-epithelialization than prior ketorolac formulations (0.4% and 0.5%), bromfenac 0.09%, and nepafenac 0.01%.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
October 1999, Annals of emergency medicine,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
April 1994, The Journal of the Florida Medical Association,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
January 2008, Journal of biomedical optics,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
August 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
December 2019, Cytotechnology,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
August 2018, JAAPA : official journal of the American Academy of Physician Assistants,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
June 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
July 2001, Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960),
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
March 2003, Indian journal of ophthalmology,
Keping Xu, and Mark McDermott, and Linda Villanueva, and Rhett M Schiffman, and David A Hollander
May 1994, The British journal of ophthalmology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!