A comparative study of ultrasonography and arthrography in evaluation of the rotator cuff. 1990

M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
Orthopaedic Surgery Service, Dwight David Eisenhower Army Medical Center, Fort Gordon, GA 30905-5650.

Fifty patients with signs and symptoms of chronic impingement syndrome and/or rotator cuff tear were evaluated with shoulder arthrograms and ultrasonography. Ninety asymptomatic shoulders of a comparable age had ultrasonography to serve as a control group. All controls had normal ultrasonograms with no hypoechoic or sonolucent areas. The 50 symptomatic shoulder patients had the following: 28 had a normal arthrogram with either normal ultrasonograms or buckling of the supraspinatus tendon; eight had normal arthrograms, but ultrasonography indicated a thin (less than 4 mm) irregular supraspinatus tendon; 11 had complete rotator cuff tears visualized on both arthrography and ultrasonography (nine of these 11 patients had surgery confirming complete tears in all); two had a false-positive sonogram, and one had a false-negative sonogram. Thus, the ultrasonography's overall positive predictive value to detect a full-thickness rotator cuff tear was 85%, its negative predictive value was 97%, its sensitivity was 92%, and its specificity was 95%. Real-time ultrasonography is a diagnostically sensitive and specific noninvasive method to evaluate patients with shoulder impingement syndrome, leading to the recommendation that it be used as a primary imaging technique to obviate or supplement arthrography in evaluating rotator cuff disease. However, static ultrasonographic pictures, without real-time ultrasonography as a supplement, were not helpful.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007592 Joint Diseases Diseases involving the JOINTS. Arthropathies,Arthropathy,Joint Disease
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D003951 Diagnostic Errors Incorrect or incomplete diagnoses following clinical or technical diagnostic procedures. Diagnostic Blind Spots,Errors, Diagnostic,Misdiagnosis,Blind Spot, Diagnostic,Blind Spots, Diagnostic,Diagnostic Blind Spot,Diagnostic Error,Error, Diagnostic,Misdiagnoses
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly

Related Publications

M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
June 1991, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
March 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
September 2019, Revista brasileira de ortopedia,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
September 1993, Radiology,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
January 2007, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie (KBVR),
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
October 2005, Clinical orthopaedics and related research,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
December 1985, Radiology,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
January 1998, Seminars in musculoskeletal radiology,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
November 1985, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine,
M K Drakeford, and M J Quinn, and S L Simpson, and K A Pettine
November 1985, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc,
Copied contents to your clipboard!