Relationship between topological order and glass forming ability in densely packed enstatite and forsterite composition glasses. 2011

S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
Research and Utilization Division, Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute/SPring-8, 1-1-1 Kouto, Sayo-cho, Sayo-gun, Hyogo 679-5198, Japan.

The atomic structures of magnesium silicate melts are key to understanding processes related to the evolution of the Earth's mantle and represent precursors to the formation of most igneous rocks. Magnesium silicate compositions also represent a major component of many glass ceramics, and depending on their composition can span the entire fragility range of glass formation. The silica rich enstatite (MgSiO(3)) composition is a good glass former, whereas the forsterite (Mg(2)SiO(4)) composition is at the limit of glass formation. Here, the structure of MgSiO(3) and Mg(2)SiO(4) composition glasses obtained from levitated liquids have been modeled using Reverse Monte Carlo fits to diffraction data and by density functional theory. A ring statistics analysis suggests that the lower glass forming ability of the Mg(2)SiO(4) glass is associated with a topologically ordered and very narrow ring distribution. The MgO(x) polyhedra have a variety of irregular shapes in MgSiO(3) and Mg(2)SiO(4) glasses and a cavity analysis demonstrates that both glasses have almost no free volume due to a large contribution from edge sharing of MgO(x)-MgO(x) polyhedra. It is found that while the atomic volume of Mg cations in the glasses increases compared to that of the crystalline phases, the number of Mg-O contacts is reduced, although the effective chemical interaction of Mg(2+) remains similar. This unusual structure-property relation of Mg(2)SiO(4) glass demonstrates that by using containerless processing it may be possible to synthesize new families of dense glasses and glass ceramics with zero porosity.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
January 2015, Nature communications,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
September 2019, Physical review. E,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
October 2017, Scientific reports,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
September 2012, Physical review letters,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
November 2013, Geochimica et cosmochimica acta,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
September 2013, The Journal of chemical physics,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
November 2023, Nanoscale,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
September 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
June 2017, Journal of colloid and interface science,
S Kohara, and J Akola, and H Morita, and K Suzuya, and J K R Weber, and M C Wilding, and C J Benmore
May 2019, Development, growth & differentiation,
Copied contents to your clipboard!