[Ultrasonically guided fine-needle puncture. The limits of the method in the abdomen and retroperitoneal space]. 1990

W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
Medizinische Klinik I, Franziskushaus Mönchengladbach, Abteilung Gastroenterologie und Stoffwechsel, Universität Göttingen.

The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound-directed fine-needle biopsy in the differentiation of malignancy or otherwise of structures in the abdomen or retroperitoneal space which look suspicious on ultrasound was evaluated from results in 558 patients (306 men, 252 women). Data from two different centres were used to characterize further the influence of different techniques of puncture, cytopathologists and groups of patients on the validity of the examination. Sensitivity (in the two centres) was 88 and 80%, respectively, specificity 100 and 99%. The validity of the examination was the same at both centres. In both centres the sensitivity was worst for pancreatic tissue, at only 72 and 61% respectively, compared with other organs (e.g. liver, lymph nodes, kidney) (P less than 0.05). Fine-needle biopsy of abdominal and retroperitoneal organs will thus be subject to a not insignificant number of false-negative results of cytological examination.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D003581 Cytodiagnosis Diagnosis of the type and, when feasible, the cause of a pathologic process by means of microscopic study of cells in an exudate or other form of body fluid. (Stedman, 26th ed) Cytodiagnoses
D005188 False Negative Reactions Negative test results in subjects who possess the attribute for which the test is conducted. The labeling of diseased persons as healthy when screening in the detection of disease. (Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) False Negative Reaction,Reaction, False Negative,Reactions, False Negative
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000005 Abdomen That portion of the body that lies between the THORAX and the PELVIS. Abdomens
D001707 Biopsy, Needle Removal and examination of tissue obtained through a transdermal needle inserted into the specific region, organ, or tissue being analyzed. Aspiration Biopsy,Puncture Biopsy,Aspiration Biopsies,Biopsies, Aspiration,Biopsies, Needle,Biopsies, Puncture,Biopsy, Aspiration,Biopsy, Puncture,Needle Biopsies,Needle Biopsy,Puncture Biopsies
D012187 Retroperitoneal Space An area occupying the most posterior aspect of the ABDOMINAL CAVITY. It is bounded laterally by the borders of the quadratus lumborum muscles and extends from the DIAPHRAGM to the brim of the true PELVIS, where it continues as the pelvic extraperitoneal space. Retroperitoneal Spaces,Space, Retroperitoneal,Spaces, Retroperitoneal
D014463 Ultrasonography The visualization of deep structures of the body by recording the reflections or echoes of ultrasonic pulses directed into the tissues. Use of ultrasound for imaging or diagnostic purposes employs frequencies ranging from 1.6 to 10 megahertz. Echography,Echotomography,Echotomography, Computer,Sonography, Medical,Tomography, Ultrasonic,Ultrasonic Diagnosis,Ultrasonic Imaging,Ultrasonographic Imaging,Computer Echotomography,Diagnosis, Ultrasonic,Diagnostic Ultrasound,Ultrasonic Tomography,Ultrasound Imaging,Diagnoses, Ultrasonic,Diagnostic Ultrasounds,Imaging, Ultrasonic,Imaging, Ultrasonographic,Imaging, Ultrasound,Imagings, Ultrasonographic,Imagings, Ultrasound,Medical Sonography,Ultrasonic Diagnoses,Ultrasonographic Imagings,Ultrasound, Diagnostic,Ultrasounds, Diagnostic
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face

Related Publications

W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
May 1983, Endoscopy,
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
January 1987, Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946),
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
January 1984, The British journal of radiology,
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
February 1985, Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980),
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
February 1983, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin,
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
August 1985, European journal of radiology,
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
May 1984, DTW. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift,
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
September 1989, Zhonghua zhong liu za zhi [Chinese journal of oncology],
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
October 1983, Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946),
W Holtkamp, and A Theilmeier, and M Droese, and R Ebert, and H E Reis
January 1991, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum,
Copied contents to your clipboard!