BIOMAT Database Logo BIOMAT Database Logo

Comparison of microleakage between direct placement composites and direct composite inlays. 1990

W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007284 Inlays Restorations of metal, porcelain, or plastic made to fit a cavity preparation, then cemented into the tooth. Onlays are restorations which fit into cavity preparations and overlay the occlusal surface of a tooth or teeth. Onlays are retained by frictional or mechanical factors. Dental Inlays,Dental Onlays,Onlays,Dental Inlay,Dental Onlay,Inlay, Dental,Inlays, Dental,Onlay, Dental,Onlays, Dental,Inlay,Onlay
D001840 Dental Bonding An adhesion procedure for orthodontic attachments, such as plastic DENTAL CROWNS. This process usually includes the application of an adhesive material (DENTAL CEMENTS) and letting it harden in-place by light or chemical curing. Bonding, Dental,Cure of Orthodontic Adhesives,Curing, Dental Cement,Dental Cement Curing,Orthodontic Adhesives Cure
D003188 Composite Resins Synthetic resins, containing an inert filler, that are widely used in dentistry. Composite Resin,Resin, Composite,Resins, Composite
D003763 Dental Leakage The seepage of fluids, debris, and micro-organisms between the walls of a prepared dental cavity and the restoration. Dental Leakages,Leakage, Dental,Leakages, Dental
D003793 Dental Restoration, Permanent A restoration designed to remain in service for not less than 20 to 30 years, usually made of gold casting, cohesive gold, or amalgam. (Jablonski, Dictionary of Dentistry, 1992) Dental Fillings, Permanent,Dental Filling, Permanent,Dental Permanent Filling,Dental Permanent Fillings,Dental Restorations, Permanent,Filling, Dental Permanent,Filling, Permanent Dental,Fillings, Dental Permanent,Fillings, Permanent Dental,Permanent Dental Filling,Permanent Dental Fillings,Permanent Dental Restoration,Permanent Dental Restorations,Permanent Filling, Dental,Permanent Fillings, Dental,Restoration, Permanent Dental,Restorations, Permanent Dental
D005899 Glass Ionomer Cements A polymer obtained by reacting polyacrylic acid with a special anion-leachable glass (alumino-silicate). The resulting cement is more durable and tougher than others in that the materials comprising the polymer backbone do not leach out. Glass Ionomer Cement,Glass Polyalkenoate Cement,Polyalkenoate Cement,Polyalkenoate Cements,Glass Polyalkenoate Cements,Glass-Ionomer Cement,Cement, Glass Ionomer,Cement, Glass Polyalkenoate,Cement, Glass-Ionomer,Cement, Polyalkenoate,Cements, Glass Ionomer,Cements, Glass Polyalkenoate,Cements, Glass-Ionomer,Cements, Polyalkenoate,Glass-Ionomer Cements,Ionomer Cement, Glass,Polyalkenoate Cement, Glass
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Microleakage around direct composite inlays.
October 1991, Journal of dentistry,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Microleakage of indirect composite inlays. An in vitro comparison with the direct technique.
October 1992, Acta odontologica Scandinavica,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Comparison of microleakage between direct placement technics and direct inlay technics.
September 1990, Journal of Marmara University Dental Faculty,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Microleakage of indirect composite inlays.
November 1989, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Marginal integrity and microleakage of direct and indirect composite inlays: SEM and stereomicroscopic evaluation.
January 2005, Brazilian oral research,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems.
August 1989, Journal of dentistry,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Direct hybrid composite inlays.
May 1988, Restorative dentistry,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Comparison of marginal fit and microleakage of ceramic and composite inlays: an in vitro study.
June 1994, Journal of dentistry,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Microleakage between composite-wire and composite-enamel interfaces of flexible spiral wire retainers. Part 1: comparison of three composites.
December 2009, European journal of orthodontics,
W Scherer, and F Caliskan, and J Kaim, and S Moss, and T Vijayaraghavan
Comparison of microleakage of three acid-base luting cements versus one resin-bonded cement for Class V direct composite inlays.
December 2002, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
Copied contents to your clipboard!