-transparent.png){kind=logo}
This paper re-examines two hypotheses on the ontogeny of hemispheric specialization that long ago fell into disfavor in neuropsychology. It is argued that these hypotheses, equipotentiality and progressive lateralization, may have suffered from misinterpretation that fostered premature acceptance of the developmental invariance view of hemispheric specialization. An alternative view is presented that incorporates both hypotheses within a neurodevelopmental context using anatomical (postmortem) and childhood aphasia data.
Related Publications
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
January 1978,
Neuropsychologia,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
September 1988,
The Psychiatric clinics of North America,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
January 1983,
Psychological bulletin,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
July 1996,
Journal of the history of medicine and allied sciences,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
October 1973,
Neuropsychologia,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
September 1986,
Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
January 2004,
Brain research. Brain research reviews,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
February 1992,
Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
January 1977,
Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR,
P Satz, and
E Strauss, and
H Whitaker
September 1988,
The Psychiatric clinics of North America,
