Effect of acidic agents on surface roughness of dental ceramics. 2011

Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
Associate Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla, Thailand.

BACKGROUND An increase in surface roughness of ceramics may decrease strength and affect the clinical success of ceramic restorations. However, little is known about the effect of acidic agents on ceramic restorations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surface roughness of dental ceramics after being immersed in acidic agents. METHODS Eighty-three ceramic disk specimens (12.0 mm in diameter and 2.0 mm in thickness) were made from four types of ceramics (VMK 95, Vitadur Alpha, IPS Empress Esthetic, and IPS e.max Ceram). Baseline data of surface roughness were recorded by profilometer. The specimens were then immersed in acidic agents (citrate buffer solution, pineapple juice and green mango juice) and deionized water (control) at 37°C for 168 hours. One group was immersed in 4% acetic acid at 80°C for 168 hours. After immersion, surface roughness was evaluated by a profilometer at intervals of 24, 96, and 168 hours. Surface characteristics of specimens were studied using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using two-way repeated ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparisons (α = 0.05). RESULTS For all studied ceramics, all surface roughness parameters were significantly increased after 168 hours immersion in all acidic agents (P < 0.05). After 168 hours in 4% acetic acid, there were significant differences for all roughness parameters from other acidic agents of all evaluated ceramics. Among all studied ceramics, Vitadur Alpha showed significantly the greatest values of all surface roughness parameters after immersion in 4% acetic acid (P < 0.001). SEM photomicrographs also presented surface destruction of ceramics in varying degrees. CONCLUSIONS Acidic agents used in this study negatively affected the surface of ceramic materials. This should be considered when restoring the eroded tooth with ceramic restorations in patients who have a high risk of erosive conditions.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
November 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
December 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
January 2010, Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
January 2021, International journal of dentistry,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
July 2020, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
August 2014, The journal of advanced prosthodontics,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
December 2003, Journal of dental research,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
December 2015, Lasers in surgery and medicine,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
January 2012, General dentistry,
Boonlert Kukiattrakoon, and Chanothai Hengtrakool, and Ureporn Kedjarune-Leggat
May 2016, International journal of molecular sciences,
Copied contents to your clipboard!