Genetic association of FOXP3 gene polymorphisms with allograft rejection in renal transplant patients. 2012

Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
Clinical Pharmacy Laboratory, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

OBJECTIVE FOXP3 gene is known to be important for regulatory T cell development and function, and is associated with the rejection of human kidney transplants. The present study was therefore conducted to determine the effect of FOXP3 polymorphisms on allograft rejection in renal transplant recipients. METHODS A total of 166 adult patients were categorized into either a Rejection group (65 patients) or a No rejection group (101 patients). Rs3761547, rs3761548 and rs2232365 variant alleles in the FOXP3 gene were genotyped using a TaqMan probe technique, and their relationships with rejection were investigated. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the genotype frequencies of rs3761547 and rs2232365 variants between patients with and without rejection history (P > 0.05). Binary logistic regression analysis showed that the rs3761548 AA genotype carriers were associated with about a fourfold greater risk for rejection compared with CC genotype (5 years post-transplant: odds ratio 3.95, 95% confidence interval 1.27-12.29, P = 0.018). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a lower mean time to the first rejection in rs3761548 AA compared with CC genotype patients (Log rank = 4.303, P = 0.038). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that rs3761548 AA genotype carriers have up to about a twofold (hazard ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.17-4.80, P = 0.017) higher risk for rejection than CC carriers. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests an association between FOXP3 rs3761548 polymorphisms and allograft rejection in renal transplantation. This association should be further proven in large prospective studies because of the small sample size and confounding factors in this retrospective study.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007166 Immunosuppressive Agents Agents that suppress immune function by one of several mechanisms of action. Classical cytotoxic immunosuppressants act by inhibiting DNA synthesis. Others may act through activation of T-CELLS or by inhibiting the activation of HELPER CELLS. While immunosuppression has been brought about in the past primarily to prevent rejection of transplanted organs, new applications involving mediation of the effects of INTERLEUKINS and other CYTOKINES are emerging. Immunosuppressant,Immunosuppressive Agent,Immunosuppressants,Agent, Immunosuppressive,Agents, Immunosuppressive
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D010641 Phenotype The outward appearance of the individual. It is the product of interactions between genes, and between the GENOTYPE and the environment. Phenotypes
D002681 China A country spanning from central Asia to the Pacific Ocean. Inner Mongolia,Manchuria,People's Republic of China,Sinkiang,Mainland China
D005260 Female Females
D005787 Gene Frequency The proportion of one particular in the total of all ALLELES for one genetic locus in a breeding POPULATION. Allele Frequency,Genetic Equilibrium,Equilibrium, Genetic,Allele Frequencies,Frequencies, Allele,Frequencies, Gene,Frequency, Allele,Frequency, Gene,Gene Frequencies
D006084 Graft Rejection An immune response with both cellular and humoral components, directed against an allogeneic transplant, whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. Transplant Rejection,Rejection, Transplant,Transplantation Rejection,Graft Rejections,Rejection, Graft,Rejection, Transplantation,Rejections, Graft,Rejections, Transplant,Rejections, Transplantation,Transplant Rejections,Transplantation Rejections
D006085 Graft Survival The survival of a graft in a host, the factors responsible for the survival and the changes occurring within the graft during growth in the host. Graft Survivals,Survival, Graft,Survivals, Graft
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
May 2008, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
February 1985, Transplantation,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
October 2009, Transplantation proceedings,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
September 2004, Transplantation,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
October 2018, Iranian journal of kidney diseases,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
May 2006, The New England journal of medicine,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
May 2006, The New England journal of medicine,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
July 2016, Transplant immunology,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
August 2003, The British journal of surgery,
Xiao-Yan Qiu, and Zheng Jiao, and Ming Zhang, and Jian-Ping Chen, and Xiao-Jin Shi, and Ming-Kang Zhong
April 2006, Transplant immunology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!