The distribution of cholecystokinin (CCK)-immunoreactive nerve fibers and cell bodies was studied in the forebrain of control and colchicine-treated guinea pigs by using an antiserum directed against the carboxyterminus of CCK octapeptide (CCK-8) in the indirect immunoperoxidase technique. Virtually all forebrain areas examined contained immunoreactive nerve fibers. A dense innervation was visualized in; neocortical layers II-III, piriform cortex, the medial amygdala, the medial preoptic area, a circumventricular organ-like structure located at the top of the third ventricle in the preoptic area, the subfornical organ, the posterior bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the posterior globus pallidus (containing labeled woolly fiber-like profiles), the ventromedial hypothalamus, the median eminence, and the premammillary nucleus. A moderately dense innervation was visualized elsewhere excepted in the septum and thalamus where labeled axons were comparatively few. Immunoreactive perikarya were abundant in: neocortex (especially layers II-III), piriform cortex, amygdala, the median preoptic nucleus, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, the hypothalamic paraventricular (parvicellular part), arcuate, and dorsomedial (pars compacta) nuclei, the dorsal and perifornical hypothalamic areas, and throughout the thalamus. Areas also containing a moderate number of labeled cell bodies were the medial preoptic area, the globus pallidus, the caudate-putamen, and the periventromedial area in the hypothalamus. Immunostained perikarya were absent or only occasionally observed in the septum, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the magnocellular hypothalamoneurohypophyseal nuclei, and the ventral mesencephalon. In the adenohypophysis, corticomelanotrophs were labeled in both males and females, and thyrotrophs were labeled in females only. This distribution pattern of CCK-8 immunoreactivity is compared to those previously recorded in other mammals. This shows that very few features are peculiar to the the guinea pig. It is discussed whether some interspecific differences in immunostaining are real rather than methodological.