Measurement properties of questionnaires measuring continuity of care: a systematic review. 2012

Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Department of Primary and Community Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. A.Uijen@elg.umcn.nl

BACKGROUND Continuity of care is widely acknowledged as a core value in family medicine. In this systematic review, we aimed to identify the instruments measuring continuity of care and to assess the quality of their measurement properties. METHODS We did a systematic review using the PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO databases, with an extensive search strategy including 'continuity of care', 'coordination of care', 'integration of care', 'patient centered care', 'case management' and its linguistic variations. We searched from 1995 to October 2011 and included articles describing the development and/or evaluation of the measurement properties of instruments measuring one or more dimensions of continuity of care (1) care from the same provider who knows and follows the patient (personal continuity), (2) communication and cooperation between care providers in one care setting (team continuity), and (3) communication and cooperation between care providers in different care settings (cross-boundary continuity). We assessed the methodological quality of the measurement properties of each instrument using the COSMIN checklist. RESULTS We included 24 articles describing the development and/or evaluation of 21 instruments. Ten instruments measured all three dimensions of continuity of care. Instruments were developed for different groups of patients or providers. For most instruments, three or four of the six measurement properties were assessed (mostly internal consistency, content validity, structural validity and construct validity). Six instruments scored positive on the quality of at least three of six measurement properties. CONCLUSIONS Most included instruments have problems with either the number or quality of its assessed measurement properties or the ability to measure all three dimensions of continuity of care. Based on the results of this review, we recommend the use of one of the four most promising instruments, depending on the target population Diabetes Continuity of Care Questionnaire, Alberta Continuity of Services Scale-Mental Health, Heart Continuity of Care Questionnaire, and Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D011795 Surveys and Questionnaires Collections of data obtained from voluntary subjects. The information usually takes the form of answers to questions, or suggestions. Community Survey,Nonrespondent,Questionnaire,Questionnaires,Respondent,Survey,Survey Method,Survey Methods,Surveys,Baseline Survey,Community Surveys,Methodology, Survey,Nonrespondents,Questionnaire Design,Randomized Response Technique,Repeated Rounds of Survey,Respondents,Survey Methodology,Baseline Surveys,Design, Questionnaire,Designs, Questionnaire,Methods, Survey,Questionnaire Designs,Questionnaires and Surveys,Randomized Response Techniques,Response Technique, Randomized,Response Techniques, Randomized,Survey, Baseline,Survey, Community,Surveys, Baseline,Surveys, Community,Techniques, Randomized Response
D003266 Continuity of Patient Care Health care provided on a continuing basis from the initial contact, following the patient through all phases of medical care. Continuum of Care,Continuity of Care,Care Continuity,Care Continuity, Patient,Care Continuum,Patient Care Continuity
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face

Related Publications

Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
December 2017, Journal of psychosomatic research,
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
December 2016, The Milbank quarterly,
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
October 2025, Journal of audiology & otology,
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
October 2020, Family practice,
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
January 2019, PloS one,
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
January 2022, PloS one,
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
October 2018, Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.),
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
July 2010, Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.),
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
July 2010, Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.),
Annemarie A Uijen, and Claire W Heinst, and Francois G Schellevis, and Wil J H M van den Bosch, and Floris A van de Laar, and Caroline B Terwee, and Henk J Schers
August 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!