Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP)-based Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) applications have been widely applied in laboratories around the world in the recent years. Many studies have shown that the best locations to acquire SSVEPs were from the occipital areas of the scalp. However, for some BCI users such as quadriparetic patients lying face up during ventilation, it is difficult to access the occipital sites. Even for the healthy BCI users, acquiring good-quality EEG signals from the hair-covered occipital sites is inevitably more difficult because it requires skin preparation by a skilled technician and conductive gel usage. Therefore, finding an alternative approach to effectively extract high-quality SSVEPs for BCI practice is highly desirable. Since the non-hair-bearing scalp regions are more accessible by all different types of EEG sensors, this study systematically and quantitatively investigated the feasibility of measuring SSVEPs from non-hair-bearing regions, compared to those measured from the occipital areas. Empirical results showed that the signal quality of the SSVEPs from non-hair-bearing areas was comparable with, if not better than, that measured from hair-covered occipital areas. These results may significantly improve the practicality of a BCI system in real-life applications; especially used in conjunction with newly available dry EEG sensors.