Laws, causation and dynamics at different levels. 2012

Jeremy Butterfield
Trinity College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TQ, UK.

I have two main aims. The first is general, and more philosophical (§2). The second is specific, and more closely related to physics (§§3 and 4). The first aim is to state my general views about laws and causation at different 'levels'. The main task is to understand how the higher levels sustain notions of law and causation that 'ride free' of reductions to the lower level or levels. I endeavour to relate my views to those of other symposiasts. The second aim is to give a framework for describing dynamics at different levels, emphasizing how the various levels' dynamics can mesh or fail to mesh. This framework is essentially that of elementary dynamical systems theory. The main idea will be, for simplicity, to work with just two levels, dubbed 'micro' and 'macro', which are related by coarse-graining. I use this framework to describe, in part, the first four of Ellis' five types of top-down causation.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Jeremy Butterfield
July 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention,
Jeremy Butterfield
April 2021, Studies in history and philosophy of science,
Jeremy Butterfield
August 2002, Perception & psychophysics,
Jeremy Butterfield
April 2009, Biophysical journal,
Jeremy Butterfield
January 2005, History and philosophy of the life sciences,
Jeremy Butterfield
July 2021, The Journal of chemical physics,
Jeremy Butterfield
January 1993, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology,
Jeremy Butterfield
March 2004, Family medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!