-transparent.png){kind=logo}
The optimum cementing technique for the tibial component in cemented primary total knee replacement (TKR) remains controversial. The technique of cementing, the volume of cement and the penetration are largely dependent on the operator, and hence large variations can occur. Clinical, experimental and computational studies have been performed, with conflicting results. Early implant migration is an indication of loosening. Aseptic loosening is the most common cause of failure in primary TKR and is the product of several factors. Sufficient penetration of cement has been shown to increase implant stability. This review discusses the relevant literature regarding all aspects of the cementing of the tibial component at primary TKR.
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
October 2009,
International orthopaedics,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
June 2002,
ANZ journal of surgery,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
December 1994,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
April 2011,
The Journal of arthroplasty,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
September 1982,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
January 1998,
International orthopaedics,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
June 2016,
The Knee,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
February 2010,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
January 1985,
Bulletin of the Hospital for Joint Diseases Orthopaedic Institute,
D T Cawley, and
N Kelly, and
J P McGarry, and
F J Shannon
January 2007,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume,
