Cost-effectiveness analysis of antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. 2013

Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
OptumInsight, Cambridge, MA, USA. Electronic address: karen.clements@optum.com.

An economic model evaluated the costs and outcomes of adjunctive clobazam therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) compared with adjunctive lamotrigine, rufinamide, and topiramate. Clinical data were used to estimate baseline frequency and the percentage of drop-seizure reductions over 3 months (all comparators) and 2 years (rufinamide). Claims data from a large US health care plan were employed to estimate costs. After 3 months, 21.5% of those receiving clobazam were drop-seizure-free. Over a 3-month horizon, clobazam was more effective and less expensive than comparators, with the assumption that >0.77% of drop seizures required medical care. Below this threshold, topiramate was less costly than clobazam. With the base-case assumption that 2.3% of drop seizures were medically attended, costs for patients receiving clobazam totaled $30,147 versus $34,223-$35,378 for comparators. Clobazam was more efficacious and less costly than rufinamide over a 2-year horizon. The percentage of medically attended drop seizures was a driver of results. Clobazam treatment may be cost-saving.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008607 Intellectual Disability Subnormal intellectual functioning which originates during the developmental period. This has multiple potential etiologies, including genetic defects and perinatal insults. Intelligence quotient (IQ) scores are commonly used to determine whether an individual has an intellectual disability. IQ scores between 70 and 79 are in the borderline range. Scores below 67 are in the disabled range. (from Joynt, Clinical Neurology, 1992, Ch55, p28) Disability, Intellectual,Idiocy,Mental Retardation,Retardation, Mental,Deficiency, Mental,Intellectual Development Disorder,Mental Deficiency,Mental Retardation, Psychosocial,Deficiencies, Mental,Development Disorder, Intellectual,Development Disorders, Intellectual,Disabilities, Intellectual,Disorder, Intellectual Development,Disorders, Intellectual Development,Intellectual Development Disorders,Intellectual Disabilities,Mental Deficiencies,Mental Retardations, Psychosocial,Psychosocial Mental Retardation,Psychosocial Mental Retardations,Retardation, Psychosocial Mental,Retardations, Psychosocial Mental
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011336 Probability The study of chance processes or the relative frequency characterizing a chance process. Probabilities
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D003362 Cost-Benefit Analysis A method of comparing the cost of a program with its expected benefits in dollars (or other currency). The benefit-to-cost ratio is a measure of total return expected per unit of money spent. This analysis generally excludes consideration of factors that are not measured ultimately in economic terms. In contrast a cost effectiveness in general compares cost with qualitative outcomes. Cost and Benefit,Cost-Benefit Data,Benefits and Costs,Cost Benefit,Cost Benefit Analysis,Cost-Utility Analysis,Costs and Benefits,Economic Evaluation,Marginal Analysis,Analyses, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Utility,Analysis, Marginal,Benefit and Cost,Cost Benefit Analyses,Cost Benefit Data,Cost Utility Analysis,Cost-Benefit Analyses,Cost-Utility Analyses,Data, Cost-Benefit,Economic Evaluations,Evaluation, Economic,Marginal Analyses
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
January 2017, Journal of market access & health policy,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
June 2010, Expert review of neurotherapeutics,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
January 2010, PharmacoEconomics,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
January 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
February 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
July 2009, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
February 2015, Journal of child neurology,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
January 2015, Therapeutics and clinical risk management,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
November 2009, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society,
Karen M Clements, and Michelle Skornicki, and Amy K O'Sullivan
October 1997, Pediatric neurology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!