The mechanisms underlying T-lymphocyte tolerance induced in neonatal mice are still unknown. It is unclear whether the tolerant state is the result of inactivation of T cells on exposure to antigen during development or of active suppression by other T cells specific for the same antigen. To distinguish between these two hypotheses, we have analysed the specificity of tolerance to three cytochrome peptides which differ by only a single amino-acid substitution in the epitope recognized by proliferative T cells. The peptides stimulate proliferative responses which are highly specific with minimal cross-reactivity. As antigen-induced clonal inactivation would address the same cells normally activated by that antigen, the specificity of tolerance should exactly match that of the proliferative response to the antigen, and each cytochrome peptide should induce tolerance to itself alone. Conversely, as T-suppressor (Ts) and T-proliferative (Tp) cells almost invariably seem to recognize distinct, non-overlapping determinants on protein antigens, suppressor-mediated tolerance should not be affected by substitutions in the proliferative T-cell epitope. Tolerance would depend solely on the existence of a shared suppressor determinant, so each cytochrome peptide should induce cross-tolerance to the others. We found that the specificity of tolerance matched that of the proliferative response: each peptide induced tolerance for itself but the response to the variants was unaltered. This result strongly supports the hypothesis of clonal inactivation as an important mechanism in induction of neonatal tolerance.