Inferring decay in short-term memory: The issue of capacity. 1977

H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
Department of Psychology, Purdue University, 47907, West Lafayette, Indiana.

Experiments examining the issue of decay in short-term memory have assumed a single undifferentiated source of processing capacity which cannot be devoted to rehearsal when consumed in the processing of a nonverbal interpolated task. Three experiments reported here call this logic into question, since variations in difficulty in the nonverbal interpolated task failed to affect recall. Slight forgetting produced by a nonverbal interpolated task, relative to a no interpolated task control, was attributed to qualitative differences from performing two tasks simultaneously rather than only one. Results from the third experiment indicated that retrieval after a period of nonverbal interpolated activity is from primary rather than secondary memory.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
May 1972, Science (New York, N.Y.),
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
February 2014, Psychonomic bulletin & review,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
March 2009, Trends in cognitive sciences,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
March 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
November 1998, Memory & cognition,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
July 2009, Trends in cognitive sciences,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
January 1996, Perception,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
April 2023, Motor control,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
January 2016, Psychological research,
H L Roediger, and J L Knight, and B H Kantowitz
October 1968, Research quarterly,
Copied contents to your clipboard!