Mutations of an NAD(P)H-dependent flavoprotein monooxygenase that influence cofactor promiscuity and enantioselectivity. 2013

Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
York Structural Biology Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK.

The flavoprotein monooxygenase (FPMO) from Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SMFMO, Uniprot: B2FLR2) catalyses the asymmetric oxidation of thioethers and is unusual amongst FPMOs in its ability to use the non-phosphorylated cofactor NADH, as well as NADPH, for the reduction of the FAD coenzyme. In order to explore the basis for cofactor promiscuity, structure-guided mutation of two residues in the cofactor binding site, Gln193 and His194, in SMFMO were performed in an attempt to imitate the cofactor binding site of the NADPH-dependent FMO from Methylophaga aminisulfidivorans sp. SK1 (mFMO), in which structurally homologous residues Arg234 and Thr235 bind the NADPH 2'-ribose phosphate. Mutation of His194 to threonine proved most significant, with a switch in specificity from NADH to NADPH [(k cat/K m NADH)/k cat/K m NADPH) from 1.5:1 to 1:3.5, mostly as a result of a reduced K m for NADPH of approximately sevenfold in the His194Thr mutant. The structure of the Gln193Arg/His194Thr mutant revealed no substantial changes in the backbone of the enzyme or orientation of side chains resulting from mutation. Mutation of Phe52, in the vicinity of FAD, and which in mFMO is an asparagine thought to be responsible for flavin hydroperoxide stabilisation, is, in SMFMO, a determinant of enantioselectivity in sulfoxidation. Mutation of Phe52 to valine resulted in a mutant that transformed para-tolyl methyl sulfide into the (S)-sulfoxide with 32% e.e., compared to 25% (R)- for the wild type. These results shed further light both on the cofactor specificity of FPMOs, and their determinants of enantioselectivity, with a view to informing engineering studies of FPMOs in the future.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
May 2002, Biophysical journal,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
July 2013, The FEBS journal,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
January 2012, Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.),
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
November 1995, FEBS letters,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
September 2023, Heliyon,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
January 2016, Enzyme and microbial technology,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
March 2012, Molecular microbiology,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
May 1980, The Biochemical journal,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
January 2016, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS,
Chantel N Jensen, and Sohail T Ali, and Michael J Allen, and Gideon Grogan
October 1996, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Copied contents to your clipboard!