-transparent.png){kind=logo}
The topography of cholinergic and substance P containing habenulo-interpeduncular projections has been studied in the rat. The research has been carried out by combining choline acetyltransferase and substance P immunohistochemistry to experimental lesions and biochemical assays in microdissected brain areas. In addition, computer-assisted image analysis has been performed in order to obtain quantification of immunohistochemical data. The results show that cholinergic and substance P containing neurons have a different localization in the medial habenula and project to essentially different areas of the interpeduncular nucleus. Cholinergic neurons are crowded in the ventral two-thirds of the medial habenula while substance P containing cells are exclusively localized in the dorsal part of the nucleus. In most parts of the interpeduncular nucleus, choline acetyltransferase and substance P containing fibres and terminals are similarly segregated and no overlapping is apparent except for the rostralmost and the caudalmost ends of the nucleus. Cholinergic activity is largely concentrated in the central core of the nucleus, while substance P is preferentially localized in the peripheral subnuclei of the interpeduncular nucleus. In addition, both substance P and choline acetyltransferase levels show peculiar regional variations along the rostrocaudal axis of the interpeduncular nucleus. The results of experimental lesions demonstrate that the substance P projection carried by each fasciculus retroflexus is prevailingly ipsilateral in the rostral part of the interpeduncular nucleus and becomes progressively bilateral as far as more caudal regions of the nucleus are reached. By contrast, the cholinergic projections carried by each fasciculus retroflexus intermingle more rapidly and only show a slight ipsilateral dominance in the interpeduncular nucleus. The results of the study are discussed with reference to previous anatomical and neurochemical data which, in several instances, had given rise to discrepant interpretations.
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
February 1991,
Brain research bulletin,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
September 1976,
Brain research,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
August 1981,
Neuroscience letters,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
November 1973,
Brain research,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
December 1984,
Archives italiennes de biologie,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
June 2005,
Neurotoxicology,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
December 2013,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
June 2013,
Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
October 1975,
Brain research,
A Contestabile, and
L Villani, and
A Fasolo, and
M F Franzoni, and
L Gribaudo, and
O Oktedalen, and
F Fonnum
August 1991,
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience,
