Schedule-induced timeout: Effects of timeout-contingent delayed reinforcement. 1994

T Lydersen
Fircrest School, 15230 15th Avenue N.E., Seattle, WA 98155, USA.

Rats' lever pressing turned off stimuli associated with various response-independent fixed-time schedules of food delivery and produced a timeout period during which food delivery could not occur. A lever press during timeout turned on the schedule-associated stimuli and reinstated the fixed-time schedule. Every response that produced timeout ended the timing of fixed time intervals; timeout terminating responses started the timing of fixed-time schedules over again. The percentage of session time spent in timeout periods generally increased as the rate of food delivery decreased. When food delivery could not occur, about half of the session time was spent in the stimulus condition formerly associated with timeout. The majority of timeout periods were initiated after 15 seconds or more had lapsed since the last food delivery. When timeout periods could not be produced, lever pressing rates either decreased or were not affected. The rate of food delivery appeared to be a primary determinant of time spent in timeout periods. The results may be inconsistent with interpretations emphasizing escape from aversive aspects of schedules of positive reinforcement.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

T Lydersen
January 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior,
T Lydersen
September 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior,
T Lydersen
October 1965, Journal of psychiatric research,
T Lydersen
September 2013, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior,
T Lydersen
June 1999, Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology,
T Lydersen
September 2000, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior,
T Lydersen
May 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior,
T Lydersen
May 1977, Physiology & behavior,
Copied contents to your clipboard!