Calibration of (192)Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source using different calibration procedures. 2014

Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
Department of Radiation Physics, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Hosur Road, Bangalore 560 029, India.

OBJECTIVE To calibrate Ir-192 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy source using different calibration methods and to determine the accuracy and suitability of each method for routine calibrations. BACKGROUND The source calibration is an essential part of the quality assurance programme for dosimetry of brachytherapy sources. The clinical use of brachytherapy source requires an independent measurement of the air kerma strength according to the recommendations of medical physics societies. METHODS The Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy source from Gammamed plus machine (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) was calibrated using three different procedures, one using the well-type ionization chamber, second by the in-air calibration method and third using solid water phantoms. The reference air kerma rate (RAKR) of the source was determined using Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik (DGMP) recommendations. RESULTS The RAKR determined using different calibration methods are in good agreement with the manufacturer stated value. The mean percentage variations of 0.21, -0.94, -0.62 and 0.58 in RAKR values with respect to the manufacturer quoted values were observed with the well-type chamber, in-air calibration, cylindrical phantom and slab phantom measurements, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Measurements with a well-type chamber are relatively simple to perform. For in-air measurements, the indigenously designed calibration jig provides an accurate positioning of the source and chamber with minimum scatter contribution. The slab phantom system has an advantage that no additional phantom and chamber are required other than those used for external beam therapy dosimetry. All the methods of calibration discussed in this study are effective to be used for routine calibration purposes.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
July 2018, Physics and imaging in radiation oncology,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
February 2001, Physics in medicine and biology,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
January 2017, Igaku butsuri : Nihon Igaku Butsuri Gakkai kikanshi = Japanese journal of medical physics : an official journal of Japan Society of Medical Physics,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
June 2016, Australasian physical & engineering sciences in medicine,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
September 2004, Physics in medicine and biology,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
May 2015, Iranian journal of cancer prevention,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
June 2007, Physics in medicine and biology,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
January 2015, Journal of cancer research and therapeutics,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
January 2016, Journal of medical physics,
Shwetha Bondel, and Manickham Ravikumar, and Sanjay Sudhakar Supe, and Buchuppudi Rekha Reddy
January 2002, Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!