Effect of mixing techniques on bacterial attachment and disinfection time of polyether impression material. 2013

Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Hacettepe, Ankara, Turkiye.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was 2-fold. The first aim was to evaluate the effects of mixing technique (hand-mixing or auto-mixing) on bacterial attachment to polyether impression materials. The second aim was to determine whether bacterial attachment to these materials was affected by length of exposure to disinfection solutions. METHODS Polyether impression material samples (n = 144) were prepared by hand-mixing or auto-mixing. Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used in testing. After incubation, the bacterial colonies were counted and then disinfectant solution was applied. The effect of disinfection solution was evaluated just after the polymerization of impression material and 30 min after polymerization. Differences in adherence of bacteria to the samples prepared by hand-mixing and to those prepared by auto-mixing were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. For evaluating the efficiency of the disinfectant, Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test was used. RESULTS E. coli counts were higher in hand-mixed materials (P < 0.05); no other statistically significant differences were found between hand- and auto-mixed materials. According to the Kruskal-Wallis test, significant differences were found between the disinfection procedures (Z > 2.394). CONCLUSIONS The methods used for mixing polyether impression material did not affect bacterial attachment to impression surfaces. In contrast, the disinfection procedure greatly affects decontamination of the impression surface.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
March 2018, The journal of contemporary dental practice,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
January 2007, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
April 2024, BMC oral health,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
August 1991, Journal of dentistry,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
December 2010, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
January 2020, Contemporary clinical dentistry,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
June 1976, The Arkansas dental journal,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
December 2013, Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
January 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics,
Umut Guler, and Yasemin Budak, and Emrah Ruh, and Yesim Ocal, and Senay Canay, and Yakut Akyon
November 1974, Journal of the American Dental Association (1939),
Copied contents to your clipboard!