The role of age on dose-limiting toxicities in phase I dose-escalation trials. 2014

A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio.

OBJECTIVE Elderly oncology patients are not enrolled in early-phase trials in proportion to the numbers of geriatric patients with cancer. There may be concern that elderly patients will not tolerate investigational agents as well as younger patients, resulting in a disproportionate number of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Recent single-institution studies provide conflicting data on the relationship between age and DLT. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data about patients treated on single-agent, dose-escalation, phase I clinical trials sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) of the National Cancer Institute. Patients' dose levels were described as a percentage of maximum tolerated dose, the highest dose level at which <33% of patients had a DLT, or recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Mixed-effect logistic regression models were used to analyze relationships between the probability of a DLT and age and other explanatory variables. RESULTS Increasing dose, increasing age, and worsening performance status (PS) were significantly related to an increased probability of a DLT in this model (P < 0.05). There was no association between dose level administered and age (P = 0.57). CONCLUSIONS This analysis of phase I dose-escalation trials, involving more than 500 patients older than 70 years of age, is the largest reported. As age and dose level increased and PS worsened, the probability of a DLT increased. Although increasing age was associated with occurrence of DLT, this risk remained within accepted thresholds of risk for phase I trials. There was no evidence of age bias on enrollment of patients on low or high dose levels.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D009369 Neoplasms New abnormal growth of tissue. Malignant neoplasms show a greater degree of anaplasia and have the properties of invasion and metastasis, compared to benign neoplasms. Benign Neoplasm,Cancer,Malignant Neoplasm,Tumor,Tumors,Benign Neoplasms,Malignancy,Malignant Neoplasms,Neoplasia,Neoplasm,Neoplasms, Benign,Cancers,Malignancies,Neoplasias,Neoplasm, Benign,Neoplasm, Malignant,Neoplasms, Malignant
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000367 Age Factors Age as a constituent element or influence contributing to the production of a result. It may be applicable to the cause or the effect of a circumstance. It is used with human or animal concepts but should be differentiated from AGING, a physiological process, and TIME FACTORS which refers only to the passage of time. Age Reporting,Age Factor,Factor, Age,Factors, Age
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D000369 Aged, 80 and over Persons 80 years of age and older. Oldest Old
D000970 Antineoplastic Agents Substances that inhibit or prevent the proliferation of NEOPLASMS. Anticancer Agent,Antineoplastic,Antineoplastic Agent,Antineoplastic Drug,Antitumor Agent,Antitumor Drug,Cancer Chemotherapy Agent,Cancer Chemotherapy Drug,Anticancer Agents,Antineoplastic Drugs,Antineoplastics,Antitumor Agents,Antitumor Drugs,Cancer Chemotherapy Agents,Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs,Chemotherapeutic Anticancer Agents,Chemotherapeutic Anticancer Drug,Agent, Anticancer,Agent, Antineoplastic,Agent, Antitumor,Agent, Cancer Chemotherapy,Agents, Anticancer,Agents, Antineoplastic,Agents, Antitumor,Agents, Cancer Chemotherapy,Agents, Chemotherapeutic Anticancer,Chemotherapy Agent, Cancer,Chemotherapy Agents, Cancer,Chemotherapy Drug, Cancer,Chemotherapy Drugs, Cancer,Drug, Antineoplastic,Drug, Antitumor,Drug, Cancer Chemotherapy,Drug, Chemotherapeutic Anticancer,Drugs, Antineoplastic,Drugs, Antitumor,Drugs, Cancer Chemotherapy
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D017321 Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic Works about studies performed to evaluate the safety of diagnostic, therapeutic, or prophylactic drugs, devices, or techniques in healthy subjects and to determine the safe dosage range (if appropriate). These tests also are used to determine pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic properties (toxicity, metabolism, absorption, elimination, and preferred route of administration). They involve a small number of persons and usually last about 1 year. This concept includes phase I studies conducted both in the U.S. and in other countries. Clinical Trials, Phase I,Drug Evaluation, FDA Phase I,Evaluation Studies, FDA Phase I,Human Microdosing Trial,Phase 1 Clinical Trial,Phase I Clinical Trial,Phase I Clinical Trials,Clinical Trials, Phase 1,Drug Evaluation, FDA Phase 1,Drug Evaluation, FDA Phase I as Topic,Evaluation Studies, FDA Phase 1,Human Microdosing Trials,Microdosing Trials, Human,Phase 1 Clinical Trials,Microdosing Trial, Human,Trial, Human Microdosing,Trials, Human Microdosing

Related Publications

A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
January 2024, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift,
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
May 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
October 2016, European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990),
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
June 2018, Statistical papers (Berlin, Germany),
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
November 2010, European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990),
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
December 2009, Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
April 2021, BMC medical research methodology,
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
May 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology,
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
May 2003, Journal of clinical pharmacology,
A Schwandt, and P J Harris, and S Hunsberger, and A Deleporte, and G L Smith, and D Vulih, and B D Anderson, and S P Ivy
July 2015, Contemporary clinical trials,
Copied contents to your clipboard!