Perceptual weighting strategies of children with cochlear implants and normal hearing. 2014

Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
The Ohio State University, United States. Electronic address: susan.nittrouer@osumc.edu.

OBJECTIVE This study compared perceptual weighting strategies of children with cochlear implants (CIs) and children with normal hearing (NH), and asked if strategies are explained solely by degraded spectral representations, or if diminished language experience accounts for some of the effect. Relationships between weighting strategies and other language skills were examined. METHODS One hundred 8-year-olds (49 with NH and 51 with CIs) were tested on four measures: (1) labeling of cop-cob and sa-sha stimuli; (2) discrimination of the acoustic cues to the cop-cob decision; (3) phonemic awareness; and (4) word recognition. RESULTS No differences in weighting of cues to the cop-cob decision were observed between children with CIs and NH, suggesting that language experience was sufficient for the children with CIs. Differences in weighting of cues to the sa-sha decision were found, but were not entirely explained by auditory sensitivity. Weighting strategies were related to phonemic awareness and word recognition. CONCLUSIONS More salient cues facilitate stronger weighting of those cues. Nonetheless, individuals differ in how salient cues need to be to capture perceptual attention. Familiarity with stimuli also affects how reliably children attend to acoustic cues. Training should help children with CIs learn to categorize speech sounds with less-salient cues. OBJECTIVE After reading this article, the learner should be able to: (1) recognize methods and motivations for studying perceptual weighting strategies in speech perception; (2) explain how signal quality and language experience affect the development of weighting strategies for children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing; and (3) summarize the importance of perceptual weighting strategies for other aspects of language functioning.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D010700 Phonetics The science or study of speech sounds and their production, transmission, and reception, and their analysis, classification, and transcription. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed) Speech Sounds,Sound, Speech,Sounds, Speech,Speech Sound
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D003054 Cochlear Implants Electronic hearing devices typically used for patients with normal outer and middle ear function, but defective inner ear function. In the COCHLEA, the hair cells (HAIR CELLS, VESTIBULAR) may be absent or damaged but there are residual nerve fibers. The device electrically stimulates the COCHLEAR NERVE to create sound sensation. Auditory Prosthesis,Cochlear Prosthesis,Implants, Cochlear,Auditory Prostheses,Cochlear Implant,Cochlear Prostheses,Implant, Cochlear,Prostheses, Auditory,Prostheses, Cochlear,Prosthesis, Auditory,Prosthesis, Cochlear
D003463 Cues Signals for an action; that specific portion of a perceptual field or pattern of stimuli to which a subject has learned to respond. Cue
D005260 Female Females
D006320 Hearing Tests Part of an ear examination that measures the ability of sound to reach the brain. Hearing in Noise Test,Quick Speech-in Noise Test (QuickSIN),Real Ear Measurement,Speech in Noise Hearing Test,Ear Measurement, Real,Ear Measurements, Real,Hearing Test,Measurement, Real Ear,Measurements, Real Ear,Quick Speech in Noise Test (QuickSIN),Real Ear Measurements,Test, Hearing,Tests, Hearing
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000161 Acoustic Stimulation Use of sound to elicit a response in the nervous system. Auditory Stimulation,Stimulation, Acoustic,Stimulation, Auditory
D013063 Speech Discrimination Tests Tests of the ability to hear and understand speech as determined by scoring the number of words in a word list repeated correctly. Discrimination Test, Speech,Discrimination Tests, Speech,Speech Discrimination Test,Test, Speech Discrimination,Tests, Speech Discrimination

Related Publications

Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
August 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
August 2020, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
January 1999, The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
April 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
September 2022, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
January 2022, Ear and hearing,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
November 2003, American journal of speech-language pathology,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
March 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
January 2020, Ear and hearing,
Susan Nittrouer, and Amanda Caldwell-Tarr, and Aaron C Moberly, and Joanna H Lowenstein
August 2022, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!