Factors associated with adoption of health information technology: a conceptual model based on a systematic review. 2014

Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
College of Health Professions, School of Health Administration, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, United States. scottkruse@txstate.edu.

BACKGROUND The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) allocated $19.2 billion to incentivize adoption of the electronic health record (EHR). Since 2009, Meaningful Use Criteria have dominated information technology (IT) strategy. Health care organizations have struggled to meet expectations and avoid penalties to reimbursements from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Organizational theories attempt to explain factors that influence organizational change, and many theories address changes in organizational strategy. However, due to the complexities of the health care industry, existing organizational theories fall short of demonstrating association with significant health care IT implementations. There is no organizational theory for health care that identifies, groups, and analyzes both internal and external factors of influence for large health care IT implementations like adoption of the EHR. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this systematic review is to identify a full-spectrum of both internal organizational and external environmental factors associated with the adoption of health information technology (HIT), specifically the EHR. The result is a conceptual model that is commensurate with the complexity of with the health care sector. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed (restricted to English), EBSCO Host, and Google Scholar for both empirical studies and theory-based writing from 1993-2013 that demonstrated association between influential factors and three modes of HIT: EHR, electronic medical record (EMR), and computerized provider order entry (CPOE). We also looked at published books on organizational theories. We made notes and noted trends on adoption factors. These factors were grouped as adoption factors associated with various versions of EHR adoption. RESULTS The resulting conceptual model summarizes the diversity of independent variables (IVs) and dependent variables (DVs) used in articles, editorials, books, as well as quantitative and qualitative studies (n=83). As of 2009, only 16.30% (815/4999) of nonfederal, acute-care hospitals had adopted a fully interoperable EHR. From the 83 articles reviewed in this study, 16/83 (19%) identified internal organizational factors and 9/83 (11%) identified external environmental factors associated with adoption of the EHR, EMR, or CPOE. The conceptual model for EHR adoption associates each variable with the work that identified it. CONCLUSIONS Commonalities exist in the literature for internal organizational and external environmental factors associated with the adoption of the EHR and/or CPOE. The conceptual model for EHR adoption associates internal and external factors, specific to the health care industry, associated with adoption of the EHR. It becomes apparent that these factors have some level of association, but the association is not consistently calculated individually or in combination. To better understand effective adoption strategies, empirical studies should be performed from this conceptual model to quantify the positive or negative effect of each factor.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
November 2020, Health & social care in the community,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
June 2014, International journal of medical informatics,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
August 2016, Electronic physician,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
January 2004, Journal for healthcare quality : official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
January 2010, Informatics in primary care,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
May 2020, JMIR medical informatics,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
September 2011, Nephrology news & issues,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
June 2009, International journal of medical informatics,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
January 2007, Studies in health technology and informatics,
Clemens Scott Kruse, and Jonathan DeShazo, and Forest Kim, and Lawrence Fulton
January 2022, Education and information technologies,
Copied contents to your clipboard!