-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Balloon valvuloplasty in dysplastic pulmonary valve stenosis: immediate and intermediate outcomes. 2015
OBJECTIVE To determine the immediate and intermediate outcome in dysplastic and doming pulmonary valve stenosis in children and to determine various factors associated with unsuccessful outcome. METHODS An interventional study. METHODS The Children's Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan, from June 2006 to December 2012. METHODS All patients presenting with severe pulmonary valve stenosis were enrolled in the study. Balloon valvuloplasty was performed on all patients. Successful outcome (residual gradient < 36 mmHg) was compared with matched doming pulmonary valve stenosis control group valvuloplasty. Difference in various quantitative variables was calculated using independent t-test and Mann Whitney U test. Categorical variables were compared using Chi square and Kruskal-Wallis test. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine various factors associated with outcome. Kaplan- Meier survival table was used to determine freedom from re-intervention proportions. RESULTS One hundred and fifty two patients (Dysplastic group A, n=73; Doming group B, n=79) with median age of 24 months (range 3 - 192 months) and M:F; 2:1 were included in the study. Mean gradient decreased from 96 ± 33 mmHg to 29 ± 20 mmHg. Group A had significantly higher number of patients with unsuccessful outcome (9.6%, p=0.02). Preprocedure gradient > 75 mmHg was the most significant factor associated with unsuccessful outcome (p < 0.001). Median follow-up duration was 3 years (range 1 - 6 years). Freedom from re-intervention proportion at 1, 3 and 6 years was 91.3%, 86.7% and 78.9% respectively in group A compared to 100%, 96.5% and 96.5% respectively in group B. Immediate postprocedure gradient > 60 mmHg was the only significant factor associated with re-intervention in group A (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results from balloon valvuloplasty in dysplastic pulmonary valve were suboptimal when compared to doming valves. However, it provides a high freedom from re-intervention rate in intermediate follow-up. Intervention at moderate severity can result in better outcome.
