-transparent.png){kind=logo}
This article describes the implementation of a peer review process for the classification, promotion, and ongoing evaluation of professional nurses in a large university hospital. From their experience, the authors discuss particular considerations and problems to be managed when implementing peer review.
Related Publications
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
January 1991,
Tar heel nurse,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
December 1992,
The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
January 1991,
The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
December 1972,
The Journal of the New York State Nurses' Association,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
January 1982,
Health services research,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
January 2014,
Education for health (Abingdon, England),
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
June 1982,
Australian clinical review,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
January 1996,
Journal of nursing staff development : JNSD,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
December 1977,
Occupational health nursing,
A C Mullins, and
R E Colavecchio, and
B E Tescher
April 2010,
Nursing management,
