Motor cortical plasticity induced by motor learning through mental practice. 2015

Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa Genoa, Italy.

Several investigations suggest that actual and mental actions trigger similar neural substrates. Motor learning via physical practice results in long-term potentiation (LTP)-like plasticity processes, namely potentiation of M1 and a temporary occlusion of additional LTP-like plasticity. However, whether this neuroplasticity process contributes to improve motor performance through mental practice remains to be determined. Here, we tested skill learning-dependent changes in primary motor cortex (M1) excitability and plasticity by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in subjects trained to physically execute or mentally perform a sequence of finger opposition movements. Before and after physical practice and motor-imagery practice, M1 excitability was evaluated by measuring the input-output (IO) curve of motor evoked potentials. M1 LTP and long-term depression (LTD)-like plasticity was assessed with paired-associative stimulation (PAS) of the median nerve and motor cortex using an interstimulus interval of 25 ms (PAS25) or 10 ms (PAS10), respectively. We found that even if after both practice sessions subjects significantly improved their movement speed, M1 excitability and plasticity were differentially influenced by the two practice sessions. First, we observed an increase in the slope of IO curve after physical but not after MI practice. Second, there was a reversal of the PAS25 effect from LTP-like plasticity to LTD-like plasticity following physical and MI practice. Third, LTD-like plasticity (PAS10 protocol) increased after physical practice, whilst it was occluded after MI practice. In conclusion, we demonstrated that MI practice lead to the development of neuroplasticity, as it affected the PAS25- and PAS10- induced plasticity in M1. These results, expanding the current knowledge on how MI training shapes M1 plasticity, might have a potential impact in rehabilitation.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
May 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
November 2019, Neuropsychologia,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
January 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
March 2020, Neuron,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
January 2022, Frontiers in neuroscience,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
November 2003, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
October 2003, NeuroImage,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
January 2020, Frontiers in neuroscience,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
October 2012, Neurobiology of learning and memory,
Laura Avanzino, and Nicolas Gueugneau, and Ambra Bisio, and Piero Ruggeri, and Charalambos Papaxanthis, and Marco Bove
March 2014, Neuropsychologia,
Copied contents to your clipboard!