-transparent.png){kind=logo}
In clinical research, study results, which are statistically significant are often interpreted as being clinically important. While statistical significance indicates the reliability of the study results, clinical significance reflects its impact on clinical practice. The third article in this series exploring pitfalls in statistical analysis clarifies the importance of differentiating between statistical significance and clinical significance.
| UI | MeSH Term | Description | Entries |
|---|
Related Publications
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
December 2021,
Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)),
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
January 2017,
Perspectives in clinical research,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
March 2008,
Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
January 2018,
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
June 2012,
PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
November 1998,
Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985),
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
September 1986,
Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
June 1999,
Journal of periodontology,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
December 1982,
Cancer nursing,
Priya Ranganathan, and
C S Pramesh, and
Marc Buyse
December 2001,
The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry,
