Whole-body bone SPECT in breast cancer patients: the future bone scan protocol? 2016

Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
aDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Rambam Health Care Campus bB. and R. Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.

OBJECTIVE The aim of the study was to compare the detectability rate of bone metastases in breast cancer patients using whole-body single-photon emission computed tomography (WB-SPECT) performed with a half-time acquisition algorithm with that of planar ± selected field-of-view SPECT [standard bone scintigraphy (BS)]. METHODS Ninety-two consecutive breast cancer patients (age range 35-74 years) underwent planar BS followed by WB-SPECT (acquisition time 28 min). Clinical and imaging follow-up data from BS, 18F-FDG-PET/CT and CT were used as composite reference standards. Institutional review board approval was obtained. For a review of standard BS results, data from a selected SPECT field-of-view were extracted from the WB-SPECT when requested by the readers. Diagnostic confidence of interpretation criteria were defined using a five-point level-of-confidence grading scale of lesions. RESULTS Bone metastases were diagnosed in 34 of 92 studies (37%). On patient-based analysis, the detectability rate of standard BS was 97% (33/34 patients) as compared with 100% for WB-SPECT (P=NS). On a lesion-based analysis, 268 foci were detected, including 124 metastases. Standard BS detected 195 lesions (73%; 99 metastases and 96 benign) and missed 73 lesions (25 metastases and 48 benign). WB-SPECT detected 266 lesions (99%; 124 metastases and 142 benign) and missed two benign foci because of SPECT reconstruction artefacts. The lesion-based detectability rate of metastases for standard BS was 80% compared with 100% for WB-SPECT (P<0.001). WB-SPECT was associated with a higher level of confidence compared with standard BS for both benign (P<0.01) and malignant lesions (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS WB-SPECT is a useful tool for skeletal assessment, showing good performance in comparison with standard BS in breast cancer patients, and may eliminate the need for an initial planar scan.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D001842 Bone and Bones A specialized CONNECTIVE TISSUE that is the main constituent of the SKELETON. The principal cellular component of bone is comprised of OSTEOBLASTS; OSTEOCYTES; and OSTEOCLASTS, while FIBRILLAR COLLAGENS and hydroxyapatite crystals form the BONE MATRIX. Bone Tissue,Bone and Bone,Bone,Bones,Bones and Bone,Bones and Bone Tissue,Bony Apophyses,Bony Apophysis,Condyle,Apophyses, Bony,Apophysis, Bony,Bone Tissues,Condyles,Tissue, Bone,Tissues, Bone
D001943 Breast Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the human BREAST. Breast Cancer,Breast Tumors,Cancer of Breast,Breast Carcinoma,Cancer of the Breast,Human Mammary Carcinoma,Malignant Neoplasm of Breast,Malignant Tumor of Breast,Mammary Cancer,Mammary Carcinoma, Human,Mammary Neoplasm, Human,Mammary Neoplasms, Human,Neoplasms, Breast,Tumors, Breast,Breast Carcinomas,Breast Malignant Neoplasm,Breast Malignant Neoplasms,Breast Malignant Tumor,Breast Malignant Tumors,Breast Neoplasm,Breast Tumor,Cancer, Breast,Cancer, Mammary,Cancers, Mammary,Carcinoma, Breast,Carcinoma, Human Mammary,Carcinomas, Breast,Carcinomas, Human Mammary,Human Mammary Carcinomas,Human Mammary Neoplasm,Human Mammary Neoplasms,Mammary Cancers,Mammary Carcinomas, Human,Neoplasm, Breast,Neoplasm, Human Mammary,Neoplasms, Human Mammary,Tumor, Breast
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D015899 Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon A method of computed tomography that uses radionuclides which emit a single photon of a given energy. The camera is rotated 180 or 360 degrees around the patient to capture images at multiple positions along the arc. The computer is then used to reconstruct the transaxial, sagittal, and coronal images from the 3-dimensional distribution of radionuclides in the organ. The advantages of SPECT are that it can be used to observe biochemical and physiological processes as well as size and volume of the organ. The disadvantage is that, unlike positron-emission tomography where the positron-electron annihilation results in the emission of 2 photons at 180 degrees from each other, SPECT requires physical collimation to line up the photons, which results in the loss of many available photons and hence degrades the image. CAT Scan, Single-Photon Emission,CT Scan, Single-Photon Emission,Radionuclide Tomography, Single-Photon Emission-Computed,SPECT,Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography,Tomography, Single-Photon, Emission-Computed,Single-Photon Emission CT Scan,Single-Photon Emission Computer-Assisted Tomography,Single-Photon Emission Computerized Tomography,CAT Scan, Single Photon Emission,CT Scan, Single Photon Emission,Emission-Computed Tomography, Single-Photon,Radionuclide Tomography, Single Photon Emission Computed,Single Photon Emission CT Scan,Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography,Single Photon Emission Computer Assisted Tomography,Single Photon Emission Computerized Tomography,Tomography, Single-Photon Emission-Computed
D051598 Whole Body Imaging The creation of a visual display of the inside of the entire body of a human or animal for the purposes of diagnostic evaluation. This is most commonly achieved by using MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; or POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY. Whole Body Scanning,Whole Body Scan,Whole Body Screening,Imaging, Whole Body,Imagings, Whole Body,Scan, Whole Body,Scans, Whole Body,Screening, Whole Body,Screenings, Whole Body,Whole Body Imagings,Whole Body Screenings

Related Publications

Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
April 2021, Caspian journal of internal medicine,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
January 2013, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
January 2017, BioMed research international,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
January 2014, Revista espanola de medicina nuclear e imagen molecular,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
January 2018, Hellenic journal of nuclear medicine,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
January 2017, Archives of endocrinology and metabolism,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
February 2024, Current medical imaging,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
February 1984, Danish medical bulletin,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
November 2016, Nuclear medicine communications,
Gad Abikhzer, and Kosta Gourevich, and Olga Kagna, and Ora Israel, and Alex Frenkel, and Zohar Keidar
June 2015, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet,
Copied contents to your clipboard!