Comparison of different moment-closure approximations for stochastic chemical kinetics. 2015

David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

In recent years, moment-closure approximations (MAs) of the chemical master equation have become a popular method for the study of stochastic effects in chemical reaction systems. Several different MA methods have been proposed and applied in the literature, but it remains unclear how they perform with respect to each other. In this paper, we study the normal, Poisson, log-normal, and central-moment-neglect MAs by applying them to understand the stochastic properties of chemical systems whose deterministic rate equations show the properties of bistability, ultrasensitivity, and oscillatory behaviour. Our results suggest that the normal MA is favourable over the other studied MAs. In particular, we found that (i) the size of the region of parameter space where a closure gives physically meaningful results, e.g., positive mean and variance, is considerably larger for the normal closure than for the other three closures, (ii) the accuracy of the predictions of the four closures (relative to simulations using the stochastic simulation algorithm) is comparable in those regions of parameter space where all closures give physically meaningful results, and (iii) the Poisson and log-normal MAs are not uniquely defined for systems involving conservation laws in molecule numbers. We also describe the new software package MOCA which enables the automated numerical analysis of various MA methods in a graphical user interface and which was used to perform the comparative analysis presented in this paper. MOCA allows the user to develop novel closure methods and can treat polynomial, non-polynomial, as well as time-dependent propensity functions, thus being applicable to virtually any chemical reaction system.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
April 2012, The Journal of chemical physics,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
July 2005, Bulletin of mathematical biology,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
June 2011, Mathematical biosciences,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
October 2005, The Journal of chemical physics,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
August 2007, Mathematical biosciences,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
January 2009, IET systems biology,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
January 2018, The Journal of chemical physics,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
February 2011, Chemical engineering science,
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
December 2021, Bioinformatics (Oxford, England),
David Schnoerr, and Guido Sanguinetti, and Ramon Grima
July 2016, PLoS computational biology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!