Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. 1989

R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
Department of Psychiatry Research, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

This study investigated the effects of methylphenidate (MPH) on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. A double-blind, placebo-control, within-subject (crossover) design was used in which 12 children, between 6 and 11 years of age, were each tested four times in each drug condition: 0.3 mg/kg and 1.0 mg/kg of methylphenidate, and placebo. Dependent measures included (a) the probability of inhibiting responses to a primary choice reaction time task given a stop signal, on the Stopping Task, and (b) response latency and errors on the Matching Familiar Figures Test (MFFT). MPH improved the efficiency of the central inhibitory mechanism by speeding the inhibitory process, thereby affording the children greater control over their actions and enabling them to increase the probability with which they inhibited responses given a stop signal. MPH increased response latency but did not reduce errors on the MFFT, and observation of the children's task performance highlighted the interpretive problems associated with this task. Performance on both tasks was better at a dosage of 1.0 mg/kg than at 0.3 mg/kg.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007266 Inhibition, Psychological The interference with or prevention of a behavioral or verbal response even though the stimulus for that response is present; in psychoanalysis the unconscious restraining of an instinctual process. Inhibition (Psychology),Inhibition, Psychology,Psychological Inhibition,Inhibitions (Psychology),Inhibitions, Psychological,Inhibitions, Psychology,Psychological Inhibitions,Psychology Inhibition,Psychology Inhibitions
D008297 Male Males
D008774 Methylphenidate A central nervous system stimulant used most commonly in the treatment of ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER in children and for NARCOLEPSY. Its mechanisms appear to be similar to those of DEXTROAMPHETAMINE. The d-isomer of this drug is referred to as DEXMETHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE. Centedrin,Concerta,Daytrana,Equasym,Metadate,Methylin,Methylphenidate Hydrochloride,Phenidylate,Ritalin,Ritalin-SR,Ritaline,Tsentedrin,Hydrochloride, Methylphenidate,Ritalin SR
D010364 Pattern Recognition, Visual Mental process to visually perceive a critical number of facts (the pattern), such as characters, shapes, displays, or designs. Recognition, Visual Pattern,Visual Pattern Recognition
D011930 Reaction Time The time from the onset of a stimulus until a response is observed. Response Latency,Response Speed,Response Time,Latency, Response,Reaction Times,Response Latencies,Response Times,Speed, Response,Speeds, Response
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D003192 Compulsive Behavior The behavior of performing an act persistently and repetitively without it leading to reward or pleasure. The act is usually a small, circumscribed behavior, almost ritualistic, yet not pathologically disturbing. Examples of compulsive behavior include twirling of hair, checking something constantly, not wanting pennies in change, straightening tilted pictures, etc. Behavior, Compulsive,Behaviors, Compulsive,Compulsive Behaviors
D004193 Discrimination Learning Learning that is manifested in the ability to respond differentially to various stimuli. Discriminative Learning,Discrimination Learnings,Discriminative Learnings,Learning, Discrimination,Learning, Discriminative
D004305 Dose-Response Relationship, Drug The relationship between the dose of an administered drug and the response of the organism to the drug. Dose Response Relationship, Drug,Dose-Response Relationships, Drug,Drug Dose-Response Relationship,Drug Dose-Response Relationships,Relationship, Drug Dose-Response,Relationships, Drug Dose-Response
D004311 Double-Blind Method A method of studying a drug or procedure in which both the subjects and investigators are kept unaware of who is actually getting which specific treatment. Double-Masked Study,Double-Blind Study,Double-Masked Method,Double Blind Method,Double Blind Study,Double Masked Method,Double Masked Study,Double-Blind Methods,Double-Blind Studies,Double-Masked Methods,Double-Masked Studies,Method, Double-Blind,Method, Double-Masked,Methods, Double-Blind,Methods, Double-Masked,Studies, Double-Blind,Studies, Double-Masked,Study, Double-Blind,Study, Double-Masked

Related Publications

R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
January 1978, Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
December 1979, Journal of abnormal child psychology,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
March 1984, Journal of abnormal child psychology,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
January 1993, Psychopharmacology bulletin,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
January 1986, Psychopharmacology,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
January 1988, Psychopharmacology bulletin,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
June 1974, Psychopharmacologia,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
April 1971, The American journal of psychiatry,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
April 1987, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology,
R Tannock, and R J Schachar, and R P Carr, and D Chajczyk, and G D Logan
January 1980, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines,
Copied contents to your clipboard!