Modeling the hospital safety partnership preferences of patients and their families: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. 2016

Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University.

BACKGROUND Patients and their families play an important role in efforts to improve health service safety. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to understand the safety partnership preferences of patients and their families. METHODS We used a discrete choice conjoint experiment to model the safety partnership preferences of 1,084 patients or those such as parents acting on their behalf. Participants made choices between hypothetical safety partnerships composed by experimentally varying 15 four-level partnership design attributes. RESULTS Participants preferred an approach to safety based on partnerships between patients and staff rather than a model delegating responsibility for safety to hospital staff. They valued the opportunity to participate in point of service safety partnerships, such as identity and medication double checks, that might afford an immediate risk reduction. Latent class analysis yielded two segments. Actively engaged participants (73.3%) comprised outpatients with higher education, who anticipated more benefits to safety partnerships, were more confident in their ability to contribute, and were more intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer a personal engagement strategy, valued scientific evidence, preferred a more active approach to safety education, and advocated disclosure of errors. The passively engaged segment (26.7%) anticipated fewer benefits, were less confident in their ability to contribute, and were less intent on participating. They were more likely to prefer an engagement strategy based on signage. They preferred that staff explain why they thought patients should help make care safer and decide whether errors were disclosed. Inpatients, those with immigrant backgrounds, and those with less education were more likely to be in this segment. CONCLUSIONS Health services need to communicate information regarding risks, ask about partnership preferences, create opportunities respecting individual differences, and ensure a positive response when patients raise safety concerns.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries

Related Publications

Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
October 2009, Journal of abnormal child psychology,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
January 2014, School mental health,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
April 2014, Journal of health communication,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
July 2017, Schizophrenia research,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
October 2008, Journal of abnormal child psychology,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
February 2016, Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.),
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
November 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
August 2006, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice,
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
April 2020, Addiction (Abingdon, England),
Charles E Cunningham, and Tracy Hutchings, and Jennifer Henderson, and Heather Rimas, and Yvonne Chen
August 2018, International journal of health care quality assurance,
Copied contents to your clipboard!