The aim of the study was to compare the evaluation of the left ventricular systolic function performed both by angiography and 2D-echocardiography on 80 subjects (31 with coronary artery disease, 18 with left ventricular volume overload, 10 with left ventricular pressure overload, 14 with mitral valve disease and 7 normal controls). The 2D-echocardiograms of the left ventricle with simultaneous measurement of the right arm systolic blood pressure was performed within 24 hours of the angiographic examination. The following parameters were obtained using the two methods: end-diastolic volume index, end-systolic volume index, ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, mass/volume ratio, end-systolic circumferential stress, contractility expressed as end-systolic circumferential stress/end-systolic volume ratio; the end-systolic circumferential stress/ejection fraction ratio was calculated only by 2D-echocardiography. The afterload and contractility were not calculated in subjects with coronary artery disease and left ventricular outflow gradient. No statistically significant differences were shown between the two methods, except a slight under-estimation by echocardiography of the angiographic end-diastolic volume index (93.1 +/- 38.9 ml/m2 vs 115 +/- 39.9 ml/m2; p less than 0.01) and over-estimation of the mass/volume ratio (1.38 +/- 0.33 g/ml vs 1.2 +/- 0.44 g/ml; p less than 0.01) was shown between the two methods for all parameters. A depressed contractile state was also demonstrated by the end-systolic circumferential stress/ejection fraction ratio. The inter and intraobserver variability was 6.6 +/- 4.4% (range 0.16%) and 4.2 +/- 3% (range 1.11%) respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)