Vitamin D Levels Do Not Predict Risk of Metatarsal Fractures. 2018

Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota (BRW, SAA).

BACKGROUND In the literature, there is conflicting data regarding the relationship between vitamin D and fractures. Reports on the effects of vitamin D levels on pathologies of the foot and ankle are limited. The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in patients who have sustained low-energy metatarsal fractures compared to foot or ankle sprains without osseous involvement. METHODS Between May 2012 and August 2014, vitamin D levels and demographic data were collected prospectively in a total of 99 patients; 71 with metatarsal fractures and 28 with sprains, both from a low-energy mechanism of injury. Data between the metatarsal fracture group and sprain group were compared through univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS Mean vitamin D in the fracture group was 26.9 ng/mL (range = 78.0-4.3), and in the sprain group it was 27.1 ng/mL (range = 64.1-8.3; P = .93). Vitamin D insufficiency (<30 ng/mL) was present in 47 (66%) of fracture patients and 20 (71%) of sprain patients ( P = .81). CONCLUSIONS A high incidence of hypovitaminosis D was seen in all foot and ankle patients. There was no difference in mean vitamin D level or incidence of vitamin D insufficiency between patients with metatarsal fractures or sprains resulting from similar low-energy mechanisms. METHODS Level III: Prospective, case-control study.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008682 Metatarsal Bones The five long bones of the METATARSUS, articulating with the TARSAL BONES proximally and the PHALANGES OF TOES distally. Metatarsals,Bone, Metatarsal,Bones, Metatarsal,Metatarsal,Metatarsal Bone
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000367 Age Factors Age as a constituent element or influence contributing to the production of a result. It may be applicable to the cause or the effect of a circumstance. It is used with human or animal concepts but should be differentiated from AGING, a physiological process, and TIME FACTORS which refers only to the passage of time. Age Reporting,Age Factor,Factor, Age,Factors, Age
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly

Related Publications

Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
March 2022, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
January 2016, PloS one,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
April 2014, BMJ (Clinical research ed.),
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
September 2012, American heart journal,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
November 2020, The American journal of nursing,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
August 2008, Annals of internal medicine,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
January 2019, International journal of pediatrics,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
October 2018, BMJ evidence-based medicine,
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
May 2006, Health news (Waltham, Mass.),
Benjamin R Williams, and Avis J Thomas, and Rachel C Collier, and Troy J Boffeli, and Sarah A Anderson
June 2022, Children (Basel, Switzerland),
Copied contents to your clipboard!