During the past decade, advances in basic and applied cardiology have led to the introduction of several new antiarrhythmic drugs that have distinct clinical advantages over their older counterparts. These therapeutic advantages comprise either a more favorable pharmacokinetic disposition in the patient or new and perhaps novel mechanisms of antiarrhythmic actions. The class IV agent verapamil, for example, selectively blocks the slow inward Ca++ current in excitable tissues and this action is proving to be quite effective in controlling supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Tocainide is a newly approved class I agent that exerts lidocaine-like effectiveness in treating serious ventricular arrhythmias. Unlike lidocaine, however, tocainide is not restricted to intensive care because it is effective after oral administration and has comparatively longer duration of antiarrhythmic action. Other recently approved or investigational agents include bretylium and amiodarone (class III), and aprindine, mexiletine, and disopyramide (class I). Along with clinical advantages, however, each drug has a characteristic pharmacologic-toxicologic profile and resulting spectrum of therapeutic application for only particular cardiac dysrhythmias. The advantages and disadvantages of each compound should be weighed equally when the new antiarrhythmic drugs are assessed as therapeutic alternatives for the older ones.