-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Functional and non-functional endosseous dental implants were clinically compared in beagle mandibles for up to one year post-operatively. Differing biomechanical conditions led to clinical differences between functional and non-functional implants. Typical clinical tests, however, did not always reveal detailed histological differences between implant-tissue interfaces of functional and non-funcional implants.
Related Publications
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
July 1984,
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
October 1985,
Die Quintessenz,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
January 1987,
Australian prosthodontic journal,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
June 1989,
The Journal of the Michigan Dental Association,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
June 1977,
Orale Implantologie,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
January 1994,
The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
May 2004,
Federal register,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
October 1977,
Quintessence international, dental digest,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
January 1993,
The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry,
J B Brunski, and
A F Moccia, and
S R Pollack, and
E Korostoff, and
D I Trachtenberg
September 1982,
Bollettino della Societa italiana di biologia sperimentale,
