Persistence of contact allergy: a retrospective analysis. 2018

Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
Department of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND Studies have shown that not all positive patch test reactions are reproducible upon retesting, that is, persistent. Non-persistent reactions might represent initial false-positive reactions, meaning that patients might unnecessarily avoid allergens. OBJECTIVE To investigate the occurrence of both persistent and non-persistent patch test reactions, to explore possible explanations, and to investigate whether allergen-specific differences exist. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who were patch tested at least twice between 1 January 1995 and 31 October 2016, with at least one positive patch test reaction to an allergen that had been retested. Both univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to investigate the influence of several factors on persistence. RESULTS Of 274 retested positive reactions in 119 patients, 183 (66.8%) reactions remained positive. The strongest predictor for non-persistence in both univariable and multivariable analyses was strength of the first patch test, with weak positive reactions being significantly less persistent. Regarding allergen groups, metals and fragrances were less persistent than other allergens. CONCLUSIONS Weak positive reactions have a low persistence rate, and the dermatologist should be conservative in advising the patient on avoidance of these allergens, especially if clinical relevance is uncertain.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D010328 Patch Tests Skin tests in which the sensitizer is applied to a patch of cotton cloth or gauze held in place for approximately 48-72 hours. It is used for the elicitation of a contact hypersensitivity reaction. Patch Testing,Patch Test,Patch Testings,Test, Patch,Testing, Patch,Testings, Patch,Tests, Patch
D005189 False Positive Reactions Positive test results in subjects who do not possess the attribute for which the test is conducted. The labeling of healthy persons as diseased when screening in the detection of disease. (Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) False Positive Reaction,Positive Reaction, False,Positive Reactions, False,Reaction, False Positive,Reactions, False Positive
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000485 Allergens Antigen-type substances that produce immediate hypersensitivity (HYPERSENSITIVITY, IMMEDIATE). Allergen
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D015203 Reproducibility of Results The statistical reproducibility of measurements (often in a clinical context), including the testing of instrumentation or techniques to obtain reproducible results. The concept includes reproducibility of physiological measurements, which may be used to develop rules to assess probability or prognosis, or response to a stimulus; reproducibility of occurrence of a condition; and reproducibility of experimental results. Reliability and Validity,Reliability of Result,Reproducibility Of Result,Reproducibility of Finding,Validity of Result,Validity of Results,Face Validity,Reliability (Epidemiology),Reliability of Results,Reproducibility of Findings,Test-Retest Reliability,Validity (Epidemiology),Finding Reproducibilities,Finding Reproducibility,Of Result, Reproducibility,Of Results, Reproducibility,Reliabilities, Test-Retest,Reliability, Test-Retest,Result Reliabilities,Result Reliability,Result Validities,Result Validity,Result, Reproducibility Of,Results, Reproducibility Of,Test Retest Reliability,Validity and Reliability,Validity, Face

Related Publications

Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
July 2001, The British journal of dermatology,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
July 1979, Contact dermatitis,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
January 2012, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
August 2010, Contact dermatitis,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
January 2022, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
January 2019, Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
June 2022, Contact dermatitis,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
November 2018, Acta dermato-venereologica,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
January 2010, Dermatitis : contact, atopic, occupational, drug,
Daan Dittmar, and Robert F Ofenloch, and Marie L A Schuttelaar
December 2001, Contact dermatitis,
Copied contents to your clipboard!