-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Preview Blood pressure measurements obtained through 24-hour automated monitoring are more reliable than office measurements and more strongly correlated with target-organ damage from hypertension. Yet broad use of automated monitoring remains controversial. The authors discuss areas of debate, explain why they favor broader use, and provide practical information for clinicians who want to try this relatively new technology.
| UI | MeSH Term | Description | Entries |
|---|
Related Publications
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
January 1988,
Health technology,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
May 2009,
Anaesthesia and intensive care,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
January 1991,
Journal of clinical monitoring,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
January 1966,
Anesthesiology,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
January 2008,
Midwives,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
January 1995,
Journal of perinatal medicine,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
June 2003,
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
November 1988,
Mayo Clinic proceedings,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
January 2004,
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology,
Peter B Bottini, and
L Michael Prisant, and
Albert A Carr
October 1988,
The American journal of cardiology,
